of the Greco-Roman Era in certain ancient Sites of Asia Minor. 81 
Thid. page 28, line 11. 
Since I wrote this translation I have reconsidered minutely the readings in 
the commencement of the original, in which part the marble had sustained most 
injury. The result has been a persuasion that no such name as Caius Tiberius 
existed in the first line. I accordingly propose the following as the genuine 
form: avaveooarta To Badaveiov Oua=pbapev, karacKevacavra d€ €k TOK@Y THY 
= Te oroav ths Tepovaias, kal ra mpoBada = vein TavTa adv TO ovTpOrL, 
k. T. A. The reading Badaveiov has been adopted as approaching more nearly 
than any other to the obscure vestiges in that part of the monument; but I 
thought also of rotyov. poS8adaveta in 3-4, is certain, and adds probability to 
the former. Toxey, in the second line, implies that a principal sum (the same, 
perhaps, which is mentioned in the eleventh under the name of yepovovaxa 
xpypara) had been destined by the parents of this unknown person to purposes 
of public utility, part of which might appear to have been expended in the repa- 
ration of the bath-house (SaAavetov) of the Gerusia, and the proceeds of the in- 
terest in constructing a portico (sroav) for the same, chambers or recesses in 
front of the bath (7po8aAaveia), the bath itself (AovrpwHv), and the usual deco- 
rations attached to such structures (tpookocpypara). Independently of these 
bequests, of which distinct notices are given in lines 5, 6, and 10, 11, we are in- 
formed that the munificent citizen, whose name has disappeared, had consecrated 
(rpockabepocarra, in 9-10) a portion of his private property to the service of 
the community. 
The first part of this titulus is of much interest when viewed in connexion 
with the passage of Pausanias, in which he notices, amongst others, the baths of 
Teos, as constructed with a view towards impressing the spectator with an idea of 
their costliness.* 
Lhid. page 23, line 18. 
The success of this rival claim to that of Sviltan-hissar, arose doubtless from 
the orthography _ djs), pronounced Noz/i. This may have been regarded as one 
of the class of nouns called by the Turks Zsm? mansub, formed from a fragment 
bs rt ‘ a.) 8 , , Bae aie pa 
*"Eors 0: nai Trios... Aovtpd.. . & emldekiv wAourov wemoimpeva. Vil. D, 9. 
VOL. XXI. L 
