ae 
Without dung in 1795, after dunged potatoes, 
ifrd) i Gah abe 
g. Middle-fizedwhole- - - 6 —— 2811 7% 
2. Large pieces - - - - 12 =———= 96 1 105; 
4, Small whole - - - - 12 —— 24 2118. 
5. Middle-fized whole - - 12 —— 24 2 11% 
6. Middle-fized whole - - 9 —— 93 19 55 
3. Largewhole - - - = 12 —— 23 10 812 
i, Shoots - - - - - - 12 ——— 1511 9% 
The real produce from 50 yards of row, planted 
with fhoots, was only 2 pecks 5-19ths, but only 63 
of 150 came up; ifnonehad failed, the produce would 
have been no more than what is ftated in the table. 
{This calculation, then, it is fuppofed, goes on the fup- 
pofition that the 150 fhoots had borne in the proportion 
in which the 63 did. ]. 
. 
: . 
EXPERIMENTS ON POTATOES. 
1794. 
Value per Acre of 
TABLE I. the era prance, 
ea SY BRE 
1. Undunged potatoes, after dunged turnips 25 19 8% 
2. Undunged, after dunged fallow - - - 2710 2% 
3. Undunged, fubftituted for a fummer fallow 14 10 4,5, 
4. Purple hearted, dibbled in the top of a well- 
dunged row - - - = - - = = 4810 64 
5. White kidney, planted in the fame manner 27 2 5.4% 
6. White kidney, upon much dung in the row 29 0 9,% 
7. White kidney, upon littledung - - - 2416 832 
8. White flat potatoes, upon little dung 30 19 O 
