188 The Hertford Correspondence. 



£ s. d. 



Haddock, Thomas, Esquire 26 13 4 



Hall, John, of Bradford 13 6 8 



Hungerford, John, Esquiro 20 



Hutchcns, Thomas, Gent 66 13 4 



Jones, William, Gent 16 13 4 



Jones, William, of Mildenhall, Gent 16 13 4 



Lamhe, John, Esquire 16 13 4 



Long, Edward, of Monkton, Esquire 33 6 8 



Long, Henry, Gent 16 13 4 



Long, Thomas 16 13 4 



Long, Sir Walter, Kt 20 



Lowe, Richard, Esquire 16 13 4 



Ludlow, Sir Edmund, Kt 66 13 4 



Martin, Roger, Gent 16 13 4 



Maundrell, Robert, Gent 16 13 4 



Mervin, Sir James, Kt 33 6 8 



Parker, John 16 13 4 



Pawlett, Sir William, Bart 26 13 4 



Pile, Gabriel 66 13 4 



Pleydell, Charles 16 13 4 



Popham, Sir Francis, Kt 26 13 4 



Read, Edward, Esquire 26 13 4 



South, Thomas, Armiger 26 13 4 



Stephens, Nicholas 26 13 4 



Stockman, John, Gent 26 13 4 



Strange, Michael, Esquire 16 13 4 



Topp, Robert, Gent 16 13 4 



Vaughan, Sir Walter, Baronet 66 13 4 



Viner, Sir Henry, Kt 66 13 4 



Waldron, Edward, Gent 26 13 4 



Whitaker, Jefferey 16 13 4 



Yerbury, Edward 16 13 4 



[The modern equivalents of the above sums would be at least six 

 times nominally greater ; though, owing to the rate at which 

 money values have increased varying so much on different articles, 

 all such general calculations must of necessity be hypothetical. 

 — N.B. The name of Hutchens as among the five most wealthy 

 suggests the query — was this the Amesbury family ; and what was 

 their fate ?] 



