Euglenes pygmaeus. 61 
Long. Corp. g lin. 13. 9 lin. |. 
Tas. Supp. x11. fig. 5. g fig. 6. 2. 
My specimen of the male is rather larger than the female. 
Description of the Figures. 
Fig. 4. Aderus Boleti, magnified. 
a. The head, seen infront. a. Antenna magnified. 
Fig. 5. Euglenes oculatus. ¢ 
a. Head seen in front to shew the size of the eyes, and inser~ 
tion of the antenne. 
Fig. 6. Idem. 2 
a. Head seen in front, shewing the smaller eyes. a. Antenne. 
P.S. Latreille, in the new Edition of the Régne Animal, t. v, p. 73, 
has removed the genera Rhaebus and Xylophilus from the Notoxide, 
and has placed them immediately after Bruchus, with the observations, 
« Les Rhébes (Rhaebus) de Fischer se distinguent des Bruches par leurs 
«« elytres flexibles, et les crochets bifides de leurs tarses. 
« Les Xylophiles (Xylophilus) de Bonelli s’en éloignent par leurs 
«* palpes terminés en massue.”” 
The Anthici populneus, oculatus and pygmeus of Gyllenhal are all 
stated (but incorrectly, vide supra) to be the types of the latter genus, 
which I cannot but think has much more affinity with Anthicus than with 
Bruchus. 
