the same is true very nearly of the averages of the diffsrank’ ero! 
of foods as the following table shows: a 
AVERAGE Ratio oF Foop 
AND FERTILIZING VALUE. 
Food value. | Fertilizing 
Per cent value. Per 
of cost. cent of cost. , 
VOL VON ITR YS? oo. dae abe omme ose a's o/ da) oie 148 
VIM: VSEPAWS 5 oo 502 y's ame steiosle\e Gate 209 
fi Six green feeds..... LES Mee 148 
‘i A Lo. CSU aS PB eH 75 
DR NSCVOD) GTAINGL 2. |... w dss. vas 15° 
ee Mwiek ve mall feeds) och. os shertcss os 109 
PRED OG 0c /a/e) Glehate nme latct bia.u hy SAR eae Yer 
It will be seen, also, that if we compare the total food and fe i . 
% tilizing value of the coarse farm products, hays, straws and green XG 
Ri forage, with the mill feeds, we find the former to have a far ty ‘ 
value (over half their cost) than the latter. i 
4 - Total wall : 
! tocost 
Twelve hays..... Be aA ell Me aa Ca ster aA F Wc. per cent — 
MITE UES 5.2) ascot ial cs Wan chatlnte Wf wile! Slashes nate wise decvece 240 DEN Cenman 
Rix ereem [eeds yh jel. s/s. Uke as sep baae Meta a Bhi ee ae 208 per cent. i 
PAVE ED Bhs’. ply Siar sae sighs ss Cole's elotetwyaheranuue wntea ham mile Wei 
Total vaiuay 
tocost. b 
PPR eOWerVe WOU Teeda a) lly Pes a ci ie eal hive ie en At ch a per cent — 
almost exactly to the market value of the meal and nearly three- 
fourths the value of the food which it contains. In other words ; 
its food value is twenty-nine per cent over its cost and its fertiliz : 
ing value is nearly seventy-five per cent of its cost. Rie 
