436 
If. In nine cases a 
ular form can still be 
accents : 
Hi. B. Dewing, 
moos te xatEot@ta n yoov,} 26, 3. 
CY LOTHUEVOV, TUYTH EMLYEUOUEVOL. 305"b: 
> , J , 
OYVOWTKTM KVEYWQOLY, 30, 19. 
XATAUPVYOVTES TE EX TOU Mholov, 49, 5. 
prhotiuos JE ay picEet, 49, 7. 
évdovtos Hédoue TO aime, 42, 13. 
perfectly good cursus is destroyed, while a reg- 
read after elision by subordinating heavy written 
imei 0& not TabTE EdOxEL, 19,10 
Teouavois teyuata otsovta. 26, 6. 
Dedenvod maida énohooxet, 36, 10. 
xootvvas xual Odmaha EnEpEoorto. 46, 18. 
tive JE TadTa, E00.” 50, 14. 
toils EmetEetayuévots TO Doauc Edidov. 56, 22—23: 
O00 EO Oi0i TE Hour, EMEOCLOTYTO.? 58, 20-21. 
aitnoews ov mavta anédoouy. 59, 3 (stressing ov). 
OUVOVIOV KVTO TH aYNXEOTH, 61, 11 (crasis). 
Il. In five cases elision leaves a cursus just as plainly regular as 
the one destroyed, with jj or wy counted as without ictus: 
maeoatuoaivas Ws olds TE HY, Qty Ve 
PLAdTTMY WS 016g TE HY, 29, 1X18) 
MOAEUOY, EY CLOQOLS TE WY, 29, 20: 
ywouy we olds TE HY, are. [i 
avtol Te nel ta vnobiyie. 41, 11. (crasis): 
IV. In two cases neither elision nor crasis can be introduced to 
avoid the hiatus: 
V. The following 
elision : 
étoeway Evdd eis puyny 3 46, 1. 
Cwyoly Ehov. 59 5—G: 
three cases are irregular as they stand without 
1. mh der oixade anjecay Diaries 
i W] ) ) 
2. nai ei wey dexta Epern, 5i, 1s: 
3. BeoBaoutEian Eig OAtyor TL, 52, 9-10. 
Of these 1 and 3 can not be read as regular forms without elision. 
In 2 elision makes a 2 form possible (stressing uéy), but the clausula 
is bad. 
There are two cases of elision in clausule as printed in the text: 
* The punctuation 
end with zxadeoratea. 
2 Cf. p. 435, n. 2. 
aVEYWONGKY EN’ olxOv. 30, 17 and 32; 16-11% 

may be questioned; the clausula should perhaps 
* If é¢ be read, the hiatus may be removed by apheresis : «v9 ’s pvyijv. 
