Accentual Cursus in Byzantine Greek Prose. 445 
éivae éoyautouery. D56, 105 
uETe TOY ahhoy ait zal 6 vids. 133,10; 
mEVTE xaL EBdouUnxoYTE. 161, 3. 
Perhaps apheresis should be introduced in 1 case: 
[a 
déyeotue EwédAroe. 153,60 2—3. 
Crasis occurs once in the text as printed, and should be so read: 
aUTM TE xaxéeivols. 126, 12. 
There remain 30 cases which do not conform plainly to the regular 
forms. Yet there are some in which the cursus rhythm may be 
suggested in spite of the apparent violation of the law. By sub- 
ordinating what would seem to have been strong written accents, 
regular clausulea may be produced! : 
1. xed mavras Boor td Ayotexor oioi TE éyiyvovto deapuyeiv ExTELVE. 
133, 1-2. (Form 6?) 
2. ti downy oreateg ovvéucsay. 146, 1819: Cy 4?) 
3. aL TD otoat@m Ogov xataotHoa. 155, 15. (Qo 2 
4. avpsdr Bohas Edeyor. 159, 23. 160, 1. Ney heap) 
5. Nehovotioy tis abso taaoyor. a Wee gi ld ls Corey E23) 
6. Eig THY Tay bhwy coyny EddeEiv. 173, 14. (ve aie) 
In the following there seems to be no possibility of recognizing 
even a trace of regularity, unless, indeed, such licenses be assumed 
as synizesis of ew (9 and 20), and reading iota as a consonant ” 
(12, 21 and 22): 
1. noQddnhov éxpvyeiv oedoov. 144, 21. 
2. mohhovds dé xai EPehovtas é&dééaTO. 125, 6. 
3. UEQOS Ov uulxooY THs Ednidos Ev cabtois EacAEveEr. 125, 21. 
4. zata “Pwucioy yeioas aoa. 133, 14-15. 
5. zaé tas tov innéwy thas: 142, 15-16. 
6. xai thy votEgaiuy yovyiay yor. 146, 3-4. 
7. dvdhoyoy 1H oomate. 131, 15: 
1 With these cases may be compared clausulze instanced as possible 
regular types by W. Groénert, Zur griechischen Satzrhythmik, Rhein. 
Mus. 54 (1899), pp. 593 ff. 
00S avTOUS MaEL YOUUEVOL. 
Tov avtod xbxhov otoépovtae. 
c ALY ’ 2 
vundany Corny péoovtae. 
én’ avtns Mavta modyuate. 
> Aes ” “0 
avatoh@y non séyouer. 
? This license is frequent in the Latin cursus. 
