EXPLANATION OF PLATE VY. 
All figures natural size. 
Figs. 1-12. Canonympha dorus mathewi. 
These show sundry variations, but as hardly any two 
specimens are quite alike, 100 figures would hardly 
exhaust the several forms in my moderate series. 
Figs. 1-4, Various forms of darker males, fig. 1 perhaps the least 
common, with no ocellus on upper wing. 
Figs. 5 and 6. Two males of lighter forms. There are one or two 
specimens (not figured) that are a little nearer to 
dorus (type) than these. 
¢ under-side. The under-sides differ much in the 
leaden line, sometimes nearly as clear as in dorus, 
frequently quite wanting, oftener more or less 
intermediate. 
Figs. 8-11. Several forms of 9s. Fig. 10 is perhaps the form to 
which most specimens are nearest. 
Fig. 12. 2 Under-side. 
Figs. 13, 14, 15. Lycena idas. 
13. Form with discal spots most developed. This 
form is mentioned but not figured by Rambur. 
14. Form with least discoidal marking. 
15. Under-side. 
Figs. 16-19. Lycena argus, var. casaiacus. 
16-17. Two ¢ upper-sides. 
18. Q upper-side. 
19. ¢ under-side. 
I 
