1872.] ON THE BIRDS OF CELEBES. 137 



TiNNUNCULUS, Vieillot*. 



11. TiNNUNCULUS MOLUCCENSis, Jacquiu. & Puclieran, Voy. Pole Sud, Zool. iii. p. 47, 

 "Amboyna" (1853). 



Cresserelle des Moluques, Hombr. «& Jacquin. op. cit. Atlas, pi. 1. fig. 2 (July 1843) ; Schlegel, 

 Faun. Jap. Aves, p. 3 (1842). 



Eab. Celebes, all the Moluccas, Flores, Timor, and Goram [Wallace) ; Borneo [Schlegel) ; 

 Java [Bocarme) ; Menado [mus. nostr.). 



The Javan habitat of this Kestrel seems to rest solely on the authority of the Vicomte de 

 Bocarme, as quoted by Professor Schlegel (Mus. Pays-Bas, Falcoiies, p. 28). 



ACCIPITEIN^. 



LoPHOSPiZA, Kaup. 



12. LoPHOSPiZA GRiSEicEPS (Schlegel), Mus. Pays-Bas, Astures, p. 23 (1862), "Celebes;" 

 Wallace, Ibis, 1864, p. 184, pi. 5. 



Eab. Macassar, Menado ( Wa/Zttce) ; Menado [mus. nostr.); Govoutalo [Forsten). 



Teraspiz.\, Kaup. 



13. Teeaspiza ehodogastra (Schlegel), Valkv. Nederl. Ind. pp. 21 & 60, pi. 12, figs. 5 & 6. 



Msus virgatus rhodogaster, Schlegel, Mus. Pays-Bas, Astures, p. 32. 



Ilab. Celebes ( Wallace) ; Menado [mus. nostr.) ; Gounong-Pello, district of Gorontalo 

 [Forsten). 



Erytheospiza, Kaup. 



14. Ertthrospiza trinotata (Bp.), Consp. Av. i. p. 33, "Celebes" (1850). 



Nisxis trinotatus, Schl. Mus. Pays-Bas, Astures, p. 45 ; Valkv. Nederl. Ind. pp. 27 & 65, 

 pi. 19. figs. 1, 2, 3. 



Hob. Macassar, Menado ( Wallace) ; Menado [mus. nostr.) ; Gorontalo [Forsten). 



Erythrospiza iogastra (S. Miiller), Verhandel. Land- en Volkenk. p. 110, "Amboyna" Tr.Z. S.riii. 

 (1839?). ^'•^^- 



Accijiiter hyogaster, S. Miiller, Jacquin. & Pucheran, Voy. Pole Sud, iii. p. 48, " Macassar," 

 Epervier oceanien, Hombron & Jacquin. o]). cit. Atlas, pi. 2. fig. 1. 



Jacquinot is our only authority for the occurrence of this species, as identified by Pucheran, 

 in Celebes ; but as his notes relating to localities are not always trustvporthy, and as A. iogaster is 

 not given from Celebes by either S. Miiller, Professor Schlegel, or Mr. Wallace, I shall not 

 include it in this list. In this instance Jacquinot's authority is doubly untrustworthy ; for he 



* It is a debatable question whether the generic title Cerchneis, Boie (1826), the type of which is F. rupicolus, Daud., "' " 



should not be employed rather than that of TiiMuaculus, VieiUot (1S07), the type of which is F. columharius, Linn. — 



