BALANOPHORACEAE — BETULACEAE 



221 



ASCLEPIAS 



Ives, Eli. Description of a new species of Asolepias [A. lan- 

 ceoiata]. 



Amer. joarn. set. arts, 1818, i, 252. 



CALOTROPIS 



Berteau, A. Les Calotropis, arl)res ;\ soie. Paris. 1913. 

 "Bibliographic,*' pp. 85-87. 



CEROPEGIA 



Harvey, W. H. On a new genns and two new species of 

 plants from the Cape of Good Hope. 



Proc. Dublin univ. zool. hoi. assoc., 1859, i, 253-255. 

 The same. 



/Vat. hist, review and quart. Journ. sci., 1S59, vi, 514-516. 



CRYPTOLEPIS 



Falconer, Hugh. On a reformed character of the genus 

 Cryptolepis Broxoii. 



Trans. Linn. soc. Land., 1845, xix, 53-57. 



CYNANCHUM 



Thunberg, C. P., praeses. Ohservationes in Cynanohum. 

 Upsaliffi. [1821.] 



GONOLOBUS 



Bocquillon-Liinousin, Henri. Etude du Condurango de 



r^quateur. Paris. 1898. 

 Buisson, Louis. Etude sur le cundurango de Loja. Pari.s. 



1872. 

 Wallich, Nathaniel. D&soriptions of two new species of 



Sarcolobus [S. globosus, S. carinatus], and of some other 



Indian plants [Campanula dehiscens, Bauhinia racemosa]. 



Asiaticft researches^ 181S, xii, 575-584. 



SECAMONE 



Jumelle, Henri. Deux nouvelles plantes 3, caoutchouc de 

 Madagascar. [Paris. 190.5.1 



BALANOPHORACEAE 



Fawcett, WilUam. On new species of Balanophora and 

 Thonningia with a note on Brugman.sia Lowi Becc. London. 

 1886. 



Goppert, H. R. Zur kenntniss der balanophoren insbeson- 

 dere der gattung Rhopalocnerais Ju/tgh. 



Nova aeta pbys.-med. Acad.cas. teop.-carol. nat. cur., 1847, .xxii, 117-158. 



Griffith, William. On the Indian species of Balanophora, 

 and on a new genas of the family Balanophore;e. 



Transactions of the Linnean society of London, 1851, XX, 93-108. 



Hooker, Sir J. D. On the structure and affinities of Balano- 



phorea;. (Reviewed by Asa Gray in Ayncrican journal of 



science and arts, 1858, 2d ser., xxv, 116-120.) 

 Richard, L. C. Memoire sur une nouvelle famille de plantes: 



les balanophorees. [Paris. 1822.] 

 Solms-Laubach, Hermann, graf zu. Das haustorium der 



loranthaceen und der thallus der rafflesiaceen und balano- 



phoreen. [Halle. 1877.] 



BALANOPHORA 



Heinricher, Emil. Beitriige zur kenntnis der gattung 



Balanophora. Wien. 1907. 

 Ph. ^'an Tieghem's anschauungen ut)er den hau der 



Balanophora-knolle. Wien. 1908. 

 Ito, Tokutaro. On a species of Balanophora [B. dioica] new 



to the Japanese flora. 



Journ. Linn. soc. — Bot., 1888, xxiv, 193-197. 



Poleck, Theodor. Chemische untersuchung des wachsjihn- 

 lichen bestandtheiles der Balanophora elongata Blume. 



Nova actaphys.-med. Acad.cxs. teop.-carol. nat. cur., 1847, xxii, 159-168. 



HELOSIS 



Zinunennann, Ernst. Beitrag zur kenntnis der anatomie 

 der '' Helosis guyanensis." Bonn. 1886. 



BALSAM IN ACEAE 



Hooker, Sir J. D. Impatientis species novae vel minus cog- 

 nitae descriptae. [London. 1910-11.] 



Presl, K. B. Bemerkungen iiher den bau der blumen der 

 balsamineen. Prag. 1836. 



Roeper, Johannes. De floribus et affinitatibus Balsaminea- 

 rum. Basileae. 1830. 



BEGONIACEAE 



CandoUe, Alphonse de. M6moire sur la famille des b^gonia- 

 c^es. [Paris. 1859.] 

 Candolle, Casimir de. Begoniacea; nova;. Geneve. 1908. 



Hildebrand, Friedrich. Anafomische untersuchungen liber 

 die stamme der begoniaceen. Berlin. 1859. 



BEGONIA 



Duchartre, Henri. Observations sur le sous-genre Lemoinea 

 E. Fourn., begonias tubSreux propreraent dits. Paris. 1889. 



Liebmann, F. M. The Begoniije of Mexico and Central 

 America. [London. 1853.] 



BEGONIELLA 

 Oliver, Daniel. On Begoniella. 



Trans. Linn. soc. Land., 1873, xxviii, 513-514. 



HILLEBRANDIA 

 Oliver, Daniel. On Hillebrandia, a new genus of Begoniacese. 



Truns. Linn. soc. Loud., 1866. xxv, 361-363. 



BERBERIDACEAE 



Citerne, P. E. Berbdrid^es et erythrospermdes. Paris. 1892. 



Hinunelbaur, Wolfgang. Die berberidaceen und ihre stel- 

 lung im system. Wien. 1913. 



Ito, Tokutaro. Berljeridearum Japonife conspectus. 



Journ. Linn, soc— Bot., 1887, xxii, 422-437. 



Tischler, Georg. Die bcrlieridaceen und podophyllaceen. 

 Leipzig. 1902. 



BERBERIS 



Boening, Richard. Anatomie des stamraes der berberitze. 



Konigsberg i. Pr. [1885.] 

 Koehne, Emil. Uber anatomische merkmale bei Berberi.s- 



arten. [Berlin. 1899.] 



Lechler, Wilibald. Berberides Americae australis. Stutt- 

 gart iae. 1857. 



Rikli, Martin. Berberis vulgaris L. v. alpestris Rikli, var. 

 nov. (1903). [Zvirich. 1903.] 



Schneider, C. K. Die gattung Berberis (Euberberis) . 

 [Geneve. 1905.] 



Usteri, Alfred. Das geschlecht der berberitzen. [Poppels- 

 dorf-Bonn. 1899.) 



BETULACEAE 



Boubier, A. M. Recherches sur I'anatomie systematique 

 des b6tulacees-corylac(5es. Genes. 1896. 



Castellamau y Lleopart, J. M. de. Estudio del sistema 



lenoso de las especies forestales. Madrid. [1904], and 



atlas. 

 Fitzpatrick, T. J., and Fitzpatrick, M. F. L. "The Juglan- 



daceae, Betulaceae, [and] Fagaceae of Iowa. Des Moines. 



1901. 

 Hartig, Theodor. Monographie der betulaceen. [Berlin. 



1849.1 

 Regel, Eduard von. Monographia Betulacearum hucusque 



cognitarum. Mosquae. 1861. f°. 

 Schouw, J. F. Ege- og birke-familiens geographiske og his- 



toriske forhold i Italien. Kjobenhavn. 1847. 



