CELASTRACEAE — CISTACEAE 



229 



nique ties phanerogames et de la macrospore des casuarinees. 

 [Caen. 1892.] 

 Miquel, F. A. W. Revisio critica Casuarinarum. 



Nieuive verhandet. eersie klasse Koninkl. nederl. insl. wetensch. lelterk., 

 sehoone kunsten Amsterdam, 1S4S. xiii, 267-350. 



Morini, Fausto. Anatomia del frutto dalle casuarinee. 2 

 mem. 



Mem. delta R. Accad. set. [st. Bologna, 1S90-92. ser. 5, i. 3-25; ii. 

 279-309. 



Contributo all' anatomie del caule e della foglia 



delle casuarinee. 2 mem. 



Mem. R. Accad. sci. 1st. Bologna, 1894-95, ser. 5. iv, 249-300; v, 239- 

 299. 



Contributo all' anatomia della radice delle casuari- 

 nee. 



Mem. R. Accad. sci. 1st. Bologna, 1896, ser. 5, vi. 201-224. 

 Mueller, Ferdinand, baron von. Remarks on a new Ca- 



suarina [C. inophloia. Melbourne. 1882]. 

 Poisson, Jules. Recherches sur les Casuarina et en particu- 



lier sur ceux de la Nouvelle-Caledonie. [Paris. 1874.] 



The same. Paris. 1876. 



Popart, E. P. Note on Casuarina planting. Madras. 1895. 

 Rendle, A. B. A new group of flowering plants. 



Natural science, 1892. pp. 132-143. 



Stache, G. K. H. De Casuarinis nunc viventibus et fossili- 



bus nonnulla. V'ratislavis. [1855.] 

 Treub, Melchior. Sur les casuarinees et leur place dans le 



systeme naturel. 



Annates du Jardin txitanique de Buitenzorg, 1891, x, 145-231. 



CELASTRACEAE 



Ettingshausen, Constantin, freiherr von. tjber die nerva- 

 tion der blatter \xi den celastrineen. Wien. 1857. 



Metz, August. Anatomie der laubblatter der celastrineen. 



Jena. 1903. 

 Stenzel, Georg. Anatomie der laubblatter und stiimme der 



Celastraceae und Hippocrateaceae. Breslau. [189-?] 

 Trelease, William. Revision of North American Ilicineae 



and Celastraceae. [St. Louis. 1889.] 



CELASTRUS 



Danty d'Isnard, Antoine. Etablissement d'un nouvcau 

 genre de plante, que je nomme Evonymoides. 



Mem. Acad. roy. sci., 1716, pp. 290-295. 



EVONYMUS 



Baroni, Eugenio. Sulla struttura del .seme dell' Evonymus 

 japonicus Thunh. 



Naovo giornale botanico italiano, 1891, xxUi, 513-521. 



Koehne, Emil. Drei kultivierte Evonymus. [Berlin. 1904:.] 

 [ — ] Evonymus semiexserta Koehne, nov. spec. [Berlin- 



Wilmersdorf. 1910.) 

 Sanders, J. G. The Euonymus scale, Chionaspis euonymi 



Coimtock. [Washington. 1909.] 

 Zabel, Hermann. Evonymus obovata A'^iiH. [Berlin. 1889.] 



CERATOPHYLLACEAE 



Gray, Asa. Remarks on the structure and affinities of the 

 order Ceratophyllacea;. New York. 1837. 



CERATOSTOMATACEAE 



CERATOSTOMA 



Baccarini, Pasquale. Sul Ceratostoma juniperinum Ell. et 

 Ever. [Firenze. 1904.] 



CHENOPODIACEAE 



Bunge, Aleksandr (A.). Enumeratio Plantaginearum Sal- 

 solacearumque centrasiaticarum. Petropoli. 1880. 



Enumeratio Salsolacearum omnium in Mongolia 



hucusque coUectarum. [St. Petersbourg, etc. 1880.] 



Carey, John. Notes on some Chenopodiacea; growing spon- 

 taneously about the city of New York. 

 Amer. joarn. sci. arts, 1849, vii, 167-171. 



Collins, G. N. Seeds of commercial saltbushes. Washing- 

 ton. 1901. 



Gemet, K. A. von. Notizen ueber den Itau des holz- 

 koerpers einiger chenopodiaceen. 



Bull. Soc. inxper. nat. Moscou, 1859, xxxii, 164-188. 



Griffiths, David. The Australian saltbush in Arizona. 

 [Tuczon. 1901.] 



The ornamental value of the saltbushes. Washing- 

 ton. 1910. 



Jafia, M. E. Composition and food-value of the salt-bushes. 

 {In Shinn, C. H. Australian salt-bushes, etc., 1899, pp. 

 24-30.) 



Kennedy, P. B. Saltbushes. Washington. 1900. 



Moquin-Tandon, C. H. B. A. Chenopodearum monogra- 

 phiea enumeratio. Parisiis. 1840. 



Schrenk, A. G. Chenopodiaceae staticesque novae vel uon- 

 dum descriptae, quas in itinere ad fluvium Tschu versus 

 legit. [St. Petersbourg, etc. 1843.] 



Shinn, C. H. Australian salt-bushes. Results of eighteen 

 years' tests, characteristics, propagation, and field experi- 

 ments, by C. H. Shinn. Composition and food value by 

 M. E. JaJTa. Berkeley. 1899. 



Vilbouchevitch, Jean. Les plantes utiles des terrains sal^s. 

 La question des salt-bushs. Paris. 1892. 



Watson, Sereno. Revision of the North American Cheno- 

 podiaceae. [Boston. 1874.] 



ALEXANDRA 



Schomburgk, Sii- II. H. Die Barbacenia Alexandrinae und 

 Alexandra imperatricis. Braunschweig. 1845. 



BASSIA 



Mueller, Ferdinand, baron von. Description of a new Pap- 

 uan Bassia [B. Erskineana], yielding an edible fruit. [Mel- 

 bourne? 1885.] 



Roxburgh, William. .\ botanical and economical account of 

 Bassia butyracea. 



Asiatick researches, 1808, viii, 499-510. 



BETA 



Caspary, Robert. Eine vierkopfige runkelriibe, Beta vul- 

 garis Moq. 



Schrifl. Phys.-okon. gesell. Konigsb.. 1873, xiv, 114. 



CHENOPODIUM 

 Rusby, H. H . Quinoa, Chenopodium quinoa Willd. 



Bulletin of pharmacy, 1891, v, 109-112. 



SALSOLA 



Desfontaines, R. L. Description d'une nouvelle espece de 



soude [Salsola radiata]. 



Ann. Mas. hist. nat.. 1803, ii, 28-29. 



Mueller, Ferdinand, baron von. Iconography of Australian 

 salsolaceous plants. 9 dec. Melbourne. 1889-91. 



Schrader, H. A. De halophytis Pallasii, respectu imprimis 

 ad Salsolam et Suaedam habito commentatio. Gottingae. 

 1810. 



CHLORANTHACEAE 



Cordemoy, C. J. de. Monographic du groupe des chloran- 



thactes. [Paris. 1862-63.] 



" Bibliographie g6n6rale," pp. 30-31. 



CISTACEAE 

 Daveau, Jules. Cistin6es du Portugal. Coimbra. 1886. 

 Planchon, J. E, Observations sur les cistinfes. [Paris, 

 1862.] 



