Iil. COTTOIDS OF NORTH AMERICA. 35 
Cx 
ought at least to find both sexes in the same hydrographical basin. But, along 
the southern and eastern shores of Lake Superior, we find the C. Franklinii, which 
inhabits the same basin as CO. Richardsonii, and, even if both of these species were 
provided with the same number of rays to the ventrals, nobody would ever think 
of uniting them in one, so much do they differ in other respects. 
If we take up the species with three soft rays only to the ventrals, we witness 
similar phenomena. Without speaking of C. Fabricti, which we have not had 
under actual examination, we find, in the same latitude, C. gobioides in the waters 
running west of the Green Mountains, and C. boleoides east of the same orographic 
range. Should the streams in which they live have a direct communication, a 
zoologist could not reasonably identify them. Finally, C. viscosus which inhabits 
eastern Pennsylvania, and C. gracilis, Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts, 
are widely distinct. The two species which resemble each other most, C. viscosus 
and C. Franklinii, are geographically the most remote. 
It is not improbable that some one may hereafter propose to unite in a separate 
genus the species provided with four soft rays to the ventrals. Our impression, 
however, is, that such a generic subdivision would be useless, inasmuch as it would 
interrupt the philosophic idea to which we haye been led by our investigations. 
Indeed, a genus, in our mind, is a group varying, it is true, as to the number of 
species which it may contain, but having, at the same time, a physical and a 
metaphysical signification. A genus involyes a progressive idea whose realization 
is materially carried out in the species. Now we are at loss to find what progress 
is involved in the fact that some species have one ray more or less to the ventral 
fins. These two facts are cotemporaneous, and their value is entirely in the dis- 
crimination of the species, and, indeed, in this respect they have an actual signifi- 
cation in the manner in which they are distributed among them. 
The same peculiarity is observed amongst Acanthocotti, and those also would 
have to be likewise subdivided. If the characters of three or four soft ventral rays 
were of a generic value, either the species with three or those with four should 
have appeared first in geological times. 
The color in Cotti has not yet afforded any safe distinctive mark between the 
various species. The ground is generally brownish-yellow, sometimes blackish- 
brown, maculated and dotted with a deeper black or brown. ‘The upper edge of 
the anterior dorsal in C. viscosus is orange, whilst in C. gracilis it is red. Whether 
that hue is specific needs still to be investigated, as well as its particular appear- 
ance in the other species of the genus. 
The following synoptical table will exhibit the most prominent differences 
between the species of the genus Cottus : 
