4 Mededeelingen van ’s Rijks Herbarium Leiden: 
leptopilus (Pol. No. 3). Type not found. 
lurida (No. 27) as Daedalea. The type in Box 143 is now 
labeled “Daedalea flavida, Lrúv.—Pol. lenziteus, Lv.” 1 think that 
is correct, also it is in my opinion ochroleuca, Lv, Hobsonii, 
BERK. and many other names. 
Molkenboeri (macrotrema, JUNGH.) as Hevagona. Type in Per- 
SOON’s Box 42. This was an unauthorized change of JUNGHUHN'S 
name to which JUNGHUHN naturally objected. (Cfr. Hex. Synopsis, 
p. 30 also Letter No. 37. 
myeroeyelus (Zree. Mss). Type in Box 138—=Polystictus tabacinus 
of MONTAGNE. 
multiplex, Favolus (Pol. cristatus). Type in Box 58. [ doubt 
very much if the American specimens usually referred to Favolus 
multiples in the museums are correctly referred. 
murinus (KoRTHALS) as Lenzites. Type in Box 242, It is referred 
to betulinus now but [ think is a good species. The gills are more 
of the nature of those of Lenzites repanda. The surface is very 
minutely tomentose, zoned. The context is isabelline. 
murinus (versicolor, ZieP.). No type found by me. The speci- 
mens in Box 137 so labeled now seem to answer LEveiLLÊ's des- 
eription but were originaly labeled “Pol. evimius”’ which LEVEILLE 
referred to Polyporus detonsus. They are surely the same as bru- 
neolus of BERKELY at Kew. 
notopus (proboscideus, JuNGH.) No type found by me at Leiden. 
There is a specimen so named by LÉveiLLÉ at Paris, but it is too 
small and seanty to serve any purpose. 
Pala (Herb. Mrqver). Type not found. 
peltatus (Fav. No. 4 as Favolus. Not found by me at Leiden. Speci- 
men named bij LveirLk at Paris is the same as Favolus tessellatus. 
platyphylla (Zip. as Daed.) Type in PeRrSOON’s Box 53. It is a 
broad gilled, white Lenzites, a good species probably. 
platypilus (Pol. sanguineus, JuNGH.). Type not found. There 
are a number of collections by JUNGHUHN of Polystictus sangwineus, 
but they are all correct and none are “50 cm.” in diameter. Lf- 
VEILLÉ’s description would point to Polystictus Persoonii though 
“pores minutissimus” hardly agrees. 
plicatus (Brume Mss). Type not found. 
perpusillus (Pers. Mss). 1 saw this collection on a previous 
trip to Leiden but did not look it up this time. It is in PERSOON'S 
herbarium. It is a little Fomes but there is nothing to. indicate 
that it came from “America boreali’”’ as LÉVEILLÉ states, and to my 
knowledge it is not an American species. 
