No. 10, Lloyd Polyporoid types of Junghuhn. [1912]. 3 
cucullata (as Merulius). Type in Laschia cover. This is a little 
Laschia, as some now class it, with a venose hymenium exactly 
as shown in the unpublished Ieones No. 37 and named „Polyphleps 
chloroleucus ” unquestionably 1 think the same species. 
erustacea (as Laschia). Type in Box 6.” When JUNGHUHN pub- 
lished Laschia as a new genus he was not aware that Fries had 
used the same name as a fungus genus. Of the two species that 
JUNGHUHN includes, the first (crustacea) is a Poria and the second 
(spathulata) is a Farolus. LÉverLké stated that there were no grounds 
for basing a genus on Laschia crustacea and on his statement the 
species was compiled in SACCARpO as Poria crustacea (Vol. 6, p. 333). 
MONTAGNE and BERKELEY took the genus Laschia to apply to the 
resupinate species with long, superficial pores, and as the name 
Laschia was preoecupied, it was changed to Hymenogramme and 
Laschia crustacea is also entered in SAccARrDOo (Vol. 5, p. 652) under 
the genus Hymenogramme. Whether te genus Hymenogramme in 
the sense of BERKELEY and MONTAGNE can be maintained or not is 
another question, but l think this species at any rate should go 
in Poria. 
durus. Type in cover, also in Box 114,* This is quite a dis- 
tinct species with dark, atropurpureus context. It was named also 
cartilagineus (type at Kew) and Testudo (type at British Museum) 
by BERKELEY. 
flavus. Types in Boxes S2* and 109* A common species in 
the tropics. For me it is a Polystictus, which JUNGHUHN beautifully 
figured and IT think he should be given the credit for the species. 
As 1 have published [ doubt if it is the same, as has been stated, 
as Irpex flavus of Krorzscn which was from te arctic regions. 
floccosus. Type in cover and in Box 35.* This is the Eastern 
analogue of the American plant called Polystictus rigens. It has the 
same context and pores but the, surface is different. 
fusco-albus (changed to Junghuhnii because it is a duplicate 
name). [ did not find the type. 
furcatus. No type found by me 
indecorus. Type in Polyporus cover. It is a Trametes form of 
Polystictus Persoonii. 
indica. (Daedalea). Type in Box 117. It is in very bad con- 
dition, eaten by insects, but 1 think is the common Lenzites repanda 
of tbe tropics which has so many other names. 
lacerus (Why changed to lacer in SACCARDO®). Type in cover 
also in Box 77.* It was published as /acevus but JUNGHUHN wrote 
his label lacerus which no doubt was as intended. The plant is the 
