4 Mededeelingen van ’s Rijks Herbarium Leiden: 
same as dilatatus (bis) of BERKELEY, which Cooke changed to Adami. 
maecrotrema. The type is tin error) in PERSOON's Box No. 42. 
The name was changed, without JUNGHUHN's consent or authority, 
to Molkenboeri by LÉverLk. (Cfr. Syn. Hexagonas, p. 30). It is a 
white Hexagona. 
microscopiens No type found by me. 
miniatus. Type in cover. Also a figure in the unpublished 
leones. In my opinion it is a thin form of Polyporus sulphureus. 
Mons veneris. Type in Box 176.* It is the same species as 
leoninus as named by KrorzscH, better known as fwnalis, a quite 
common species in the Kast. 
niveus. Type in Polyporus cover. It is undeterminable, a 
white Poria or more probably the resupinate portion of some 
Polyporus. 
obovatus. Only a small fragment remains of the type in Box 
20.* 1 judge it is the same plant as rasipes of BERKELEY and very 
close to laceratus but not the same. 
pellucida. Type in Box 21. [ believe this is a rare species. The 
hymenium is rose color and is pubeseent under a lens. The micro- 
scope shows the slender hairs hyaline and slightly inerusted. The 
pores are large and shallow. For me it is a Polystictus in the same 
section as dermatodes. It does not appear to me to be pellucid. 
pustulosns (as Favolus). No types found by me and the figure 
cited was not published. From the description it is evidently a 
Laschia and probably the same as HOLTERMANN figured as Laschia 
javanicus. 1 think HeNNiNGs has also named it. In the sense of Lf- 
VEILLÉ (specimen in PATOUILLARD's herbarium) it is Hezagona Miquelii, 
but LÉveirLE got a great many things wrong. 
punetatus. No type found. 
roseo-alba. Type in Box 11.* A subresupinate Polyporus or 
perhaps a Fomes, most probably the same as carneus in the original 
sense of Nees. L think it is quite different from the plant we have 
in the United States which we know as Polyporus (or Fomes) 
carneus, rarely forgetting to add the „Nees” though there exists 
not the slightest evidence that our American plant ever grew in Java. 
spadiceus. Type in cover, also in Box 49*—Polystictus taba- 
cinus. The figure that JUNGHUHN gave appears smooth but the plant 
is densely tomentose. The shape is also unusual as the plant is 
usually dimidiate. 
spathulatus (as Zaschia). Type in Box 127.* It is a Favolus. 
The types are in very poor condition. 
tropieus. Type in Box 170.* It is a Polyporus (not a Fomes 
