Inmost hoohs the I, or first j^ev son, is omitted; in this 

 it ivill he retained : that, in respect to egotism, is the main 

 difference. We commonly do not rememher that it is, after 

 all, ahvays the first jjer son that is speaMng. I should not 

 talk so much ahout myself if there luere anyhody else luhom 

 I hneiv as well. Unfortunately lam confined to this theme 

 ly the narrowness of my experience. 



Thokeau's ''Walden^/' 



