76 FAUNA ANTIQUA SIVALENSIS. 
9-7 in. (from posterior margins of respective condyles to anterior margins of rotular 
surface.) Length of rotular surface (in centre), 5°5in. Breadth of rotular surface 
(in centre), 5°6 in. Circumference at commencement of fractured portion 13 in. above 
inferior articular surface, 22° in. 
Figs. 2 and 2 a.—Hlephas Namadicus. Lower end of right tibia, 
with articular surface ; from the Nerbudda.— B.M. 
Greatest transverse diameter of inferior extremity, 7-4in. Greatest antero- 
posterior diameter of ditto, 6-lin. Projection downwards of the internal mal- 
leolus, 1:4in. Circumference at broken end 9 in. above inferior surface, 12°6 in. 
Figs. 3 and 38 a.—Elephas Namadicus, Upper end of right radius ; 
from the Nerbudda.—B.M. 
Greatest transverse diameter, 6°2in. Greatest antero-posterior diameter, 3°8 in. 
Figs. 4, 4a, and 4 b.—Elephas Namadicus. Dorsal. vertebra ; from 
the Nerbudda.—B.M. 
Height of body, anteriorly, 5-8in. Breadth of body, anteriorly, 5-6in. Length 
of body, inferiorly, 2°4in. Spinal canal, height, anteriorly, 2°in. Spinal canal, 
breadth, anteriorly, 3°in. Between extreme points of transverse processes, 12°8 in. 
Anterior costal surface, height, 2°6 in. Anterior costal surface, breadth, 1-8 in. 
Fig. 5.—Elephas Namadicus. Veit femur in three fragments. This 
figure is copied from an illustration of Mr. J. Prinsep’s description of 
a fossil found by Dr. Spilsbury in the Nerbudda Valley, near Nar- 
sinhpoor (Journ. As. Soc., Aug. 1834, vol. ii. p. 896, Plate XXIV. 
fig.3). The dimensions of the femur, while it remained whole and at- 
tached to the rocky matrix, were as follows:— 
Greatest length, 63:in. Circumference of the head, 27-in.; diameter of ditto, 
8:°75in. Breadth from tip of great trochanter to inner edge of head, 18*in.  Cir- 
cumference of shaft at centre, 19°in. Breadth of condyles, 11: in. 
Fig. 6—Elephas Namadicus. Fragments of right femur. The epi- 
physis of the head is lost, but its place is shown by a dotted line. This 
ficure is copied from the same scurce as the last. (Journ. As. Soc., vol. iil. 
Plate XXIV. figs. 9 and 10. Fig. 6a. is lower end of the left femur 
represented in fig. 5, and not of that in fig. 6, as might be inferred trom 
dotted line in Plate. 
Fig. 7.—Elephas Namadicus. Humerus; copied from the illustra- 
tion of a paper by Dr. Spilsbury in Journ. As. Soc., June 1837, vol. 
vi. p. 487, Plate XXX. fig. 1. 
Fig. 8.—Elephas Namadicus. Bonesof pelvis with acetabulum, copied 
from same source as fig. 7. (Plate XXX. figs. 5 and 6.) 
Fig. 9.—Elephas Namadicus. Lower jaw, with molar incomplete at 
left side. This specimen is also copied from an illustration of Mr. J. 
Prinsep’s description of a fossil found by Dr. Spilsbury in the Nerbudda 
Valley (Journ. As. Soc., Nov. 1833, vol. ii. p. 583, Plate XX. fig. 1). 
The jaw is inverted in the drawing. 
Length of tooth, 11°5in. Breadth, 3°5in. Length of grinding surface, 8°5 in. 
Girth of jaw-bone, 24:in. Probable length from chin to condyle, 26° in. 
A description of the locality where the Nerbudda fossils were found, with sec- 
tional drawings, will be found in the paper above referred to. 
Figs. 10 and 10 a.—Elephas insignis. Fragment of molar showing 
four plates. The specimen is remarkable as coming from the Valley 
of the Nerbudda.—B.M. 
Length of molar, 4‘7in. Greatest breadth, 3-lin. Height of fragment, 6-in, 
