1136 
netic dipoles is now given by (8) and (9) if we merely substitute 
in (10) 0,’,0,’ and p’ (fig. 3) for 6,,6, and g. 
We thus find: 
DP = 2cosw,cosw,sinO ,sinO, + cosp (sinw,sinw, + cosw,cosw,cosO ,cosO,) + 
25 
+ sin p (cos w, sin w, cos 0, — sin w, cos w, cos O,) (22) 
Instead of (12) we obtain 
2 = cosy (cos w, sin A, — cos w, sinG,) + siny {cos w, cos, cos | (26) 
+ sina, sin + cos, cos A, cos (W + @) + sina, sin (W + g)i \ 
ab dw, dw,, while (16), (18) and (19) un- 
dergo similar changes, where the integrations with respect to w, 
and w, have to be extended from O0 to 22. 
The term {2 in (20) again gives zero. 
This is also the case with WY! (2—3 9’), / being a positive integer, 
so that the conclusion drawn in § 3 remains valid here also. 
Again we find contributions due to 2—3 2? multiplied by 4» 
and ®? viz. 
(15) is multiplied by 
AMon = = —— — — XG" (AD) ROn MU, (Ale) 
v 
while for AJZ,, (236) is found again, as might have been expected 
for this term is independent of the quadrupolar forces and hence 
the situation of the dipolar axis with respect to the quadrupolar 
axis is without influence on AM. 
Further Y when multiplied by 4—380 2* + 15 2* gives a con- 
tribution : 
DM ae a OY, hog (ABG) MS. 878) 
v 
§ 6. The values of Am and A, corresponding to the AM, and 
AM, found in § 4, may now easily be written down. Both have 
now the sign agreeing with the observations. 
For the circumstances chosen in § 4 we have now (for oxygen): 
Agm = 0.0041, A, = 0.0013. From this we see that the conclusions 
of § 4 are also valid assuming that the dipolar axis is perpendicular 
to the quadrupolar axis. 
