799 



and Fungia decipiens. None of these four species is older than 

 Miocene and two of them are still alive. So on account of his 

 own determinations Doi. i>fus should have placed the 

 fauna in the Neogene. However, Vlcarya and Turbo have 

 been wrongly determined; so only Venus ?ion-scripta {= dementia 

 papy racen) and Fuiujid decipiens I'emain. 



Besides the 12 fossils here dealt with, Dollfus has still published 

 9 others which are described as new, and 3 of which only the 

 genus could be stated. Among tlie forms considered as new are 

 two corals, among the genera mentioned in all probability ii'M/><^//'rt'^?Y6?; 

 all the other fossils are mollusca. If these objects had not been so 

 badly preserved, something might pei'haps be concluded from their 

 relationship with other known forms; this is not the case now. 



Conclusion : In the alluvium of Enrekang Neogene 

 fossils are found, while oldei-, more particularly 

 Oligocene fossils, have until now not been proved 

 in that locality. No more is there any proof for t lie 

 occurrence of Oligocene in the ridge S.E. of Enrekang. 



57* 



