( 403 ) 
The separate observations and their results follow here: 
Limb. Chron. time. Hour angle. Reading Sext. Latitude. 
] ilk 2m 41s — Ilm 20s 4 1269 1020" | — 7° 50' 53 
u 3 30 10 31.4 127 16 20 50° Eee 
| 4 17 9 44.4 126 14 50 50” 8.8 
u 5 18 8 43.4 12%, 21+ 10 49 58.7 
| Gey 7 52.4 126 19 50 49 54.1 
u 6 54 MES 127 25 10 19 43.0 
l 7 42 Bg 4. 126 22 20 GO eer 
u 8 24 5 37.4 127 27 40 49 46.8 
] 9 5 4 56.4 126 24 40 50 3.9 
u 9 42 4 19.4 1 F290 0 50 0.0 
] 21 3 + 7 1.6 126 21 10 50 6.0 
u 21 42 7 40.6 127 23 10 50 9.3 
| 22 16 8 14.6 126 18 5 50 22.1 
u 22 50 8 48.6 127 20 30 50 12.4 
| 23 29 9 27.6 126 15 30 50 11.0 
u 24 45 10 43.6 127 15 40 50 3.5 
l 25 33 ll 31.6 126 9 20 50 17.8 
u 26 9 ee 197 Tes" 25 49 59.7 
| 26 46 12 44.6 126 5 50 50 8 
u 21 26 13 24,6 127 det 0 49 57.9 
Hence : 
Latitude from lower limb — 7° 50! 8"05 
ú upper w 49 59.25 
Mean result — 7° 50! 3/6 
Difference upper limb—lower limb + 8/8 
The value now found for the personal contact error agrees fairly 
well with that found from the first series. 
If again we correct the separate results for the mean value of 
this error, viz. 5".3, we now get as mean error of one pointing + 8".3 
