693 
TABLE II. (Continued). E. Heliacic setting. 
lt Bme | ; ‚Period. | Date 
Year „Date interval ‚Longitude | Synode Ee number | calculated 
| | 
| | | 
135 | VII 13 14°40 M | 29 13 
| 45 | 32056’ 
136 | VIIL28 17 36 > 11 28 
| 48 36 0 
rione. Ms (a 23:36 146 23 16 
48 36 0 
SS Od Oa: a IOiSG- WE 5 4 
48 36 0 
139 | XII 22 OERLE EMA DRU | 17 22 
| 48 | 36 0 
141 P40 (hoard Oh + 2 | 29 10 
48 | 36 0 | 
a2") 1-28 (Peel WAS 11 28 
| 44) 31 14 SE 
143 Ill 12 18 50 oS 24 12 
42 30 0 
144 IV oa | 18 50 6) 6 24 
42 30 0 
145* | VI 6 18 50 mp 18 6 
42 30 0 
146 VI 18 isch ae 0 18 
le 40 30 0 
147 Vik so +| 18 50 m 12 | 30 
| | 46 |, 33 46 | 
149°)" (TX 16 2236 +> | 24 | 16 
a5 lee” 360 
(494 \2 rs 4 | 2836 40 6 4 
| 48 36 0 
BOE 5 XI 22 “| 436 X 18 gp 
48 36 0 
1517+ | XII-10 | 10 36 ¥ | 0 10 
48 36 0 
{5s 7 4-98 16 36 WY 12 28 
| 48 36 0 
154 Il 16 | 22 36 TI 24 16 
448 30 24 
155 UI 29 | 23 0!) 55 | 6 29 
42 30 0 | 
156*=| IV SA || 23-0. CY 18 11 
| ee: ae RE er 0 
157, {IV * 237 4} 23 0 np | 0 23 
an examination of the tables of the 2ed kind had shown the way. 
From the large Jupiter table of the 2°¢ kind, which consists of 
5 fragments fitting together Sp. 11574, Sp. 11 42, Sp. II 107, Sp. II 68 
and Sp. IL876, we have put the dates together in table III (the 
missing ones are represented by numbers in brackets : these numbers 
were inserted by Kverer; as will be shown his conjecture usually 
agrees with the result of our calculations), as well as the longitudes and 
the synodie ares ’). 
=p Kugler’s value 23 36 (difference thus 31 0) is copied erroneously from the 
cuneiform writing, where 23 0 stands. 
2) Of the longitudes also many are missing owing to damage of the cuneiform 
texts; but KUGLER was able to reconstruct them with complete certainty. 
