167 



t. Nostril nearly in the middle between 



eye and tip of snout 41. A", chalcoiiota p. 2 1 7. 



tf. Nostril nearer tip of snout than eye, 42. R. labialis p. 220. 

 3. Series of teeth 4 — 6/4. 



a. Tail acutely pointed 24. A', bichiosa p. 196. 



b. Tail rounded 25. R. debiissyi p. 197. 



B. A. large sucking disk behind the mouth. 



I. Lips with papillae. 



1. Both jaws undivided. Series of teeth 



7 — 8/7 — 10 34, R. Jerboa p. 208. 



2. Both jaws divided into two pieces. Series 



of teeth 5/5 35- ^. whiteheadi p. 210. 



11. Lips devoid of papillae. 



1. Series of teeth 11/5 36. A*, cavitynipamim p. 211. 



2. Series of teeth 4/4 40. R. hosii\ p. 215. 



Subg. a. Rana L. 



Fingers and toes not dilated at the tip, or with dilatations 

 devoid of horizontal groove. Outer metatarsals separated by 

 web, at least in their distal half. Dorsolateral fold present or absent. 



Distribution: that of the genus. 



I. Rana limnocharis Boie. 



Ratia limnocharis (Boie) Wiegmann, N. Acta Acad. Leop. -Carol., XVII, I, 



183s, P- 255. 

 Rana gracilis (Wiegm.) Boulenger, Cat. Batr. Sal. Brit. Mus., 1882, p. 28. 

 Rana limnocharis Boulenger, Fasciculi Malayenses, Zool., pt. I, 1903, p. 134. 

 Rana limnocharis Stejneger, Bull. US. Nat. Mus., LVIII, 1907, p. 127, figs. 



107 — no (head, hand and foot). 

 Rana limnocharis v. Kampen, Nat. Tijdschr. Ned. -Indie, LXIX, 1909, p. 35 



(tadpole). 

 Rana limnocharis Boulenger, Vert. Fauna Malay Penins., Rept. and Batr., London, 



1912, p. 236. 

 Rana (Fejervdrya) limnocharis Bolkay, Anat. Anz., XLVIII, 1915 — 16, p. 181. 

 Rana limnocharis Smith, Jrn. Nat. Hist. See. Siam, II, 191 7, p. 165 (tadpole). 

 Rana wasl Annandale, Mem. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, VI, 1917, p. 131, pi. V, fig. 5 



(head) and text-fig. 3 A (foot). 

 Rana limtiocharis Annandale, Mem. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, VI, 1917, p. 132, pi. V, 



fig. 6 (head), pi. VI, fig. 2 (tadpole)'), text-fig. 2b (mouth of tadpole ') and 



lb (foot). 

 Rana limnocharis Boulenger, Rec. Ind. Mus., XX, 1920, p. 28. 



i) After a specimen from Madras, which in some respects differs from those 

 of the Indian Archipelago. 



