CMA 
And so as yet I feel unable to give a sufficient explanation of the 
inequality which has been found. 
EXPLANATION OF THE FIGURES. 
Fig. 1. Supplementary inequality 1878— 1886. 
2. ‘ 5 1887 — 1896. 
» 9 Non-periodic part of the daily rate for + 8°.7 R. 1878—1898. 
» 4. Supplementary inequality 1862—1874, 
» 9. Non-periodic part of the daily rate for + 10° R. 1862—1874. 
„ 6, Supplementary inequality 1899—1902. 
„ 7. The same inequality if the influence of the temperature is assumed to 
be linear. 
In the Vig. 1,2,4,6,7 the letters D., J. etc. stand for: December 1, January 1, etc. 
In the Fig. 3 and 5 the numbers: 78, 62 etc. stand for: 1878 June 15, 1862 
June 15 etc. 
In Fig. 5 for 79 read 69. 
ERRATUM: 
p. 47. Behind the title of the communication of Prof. J. W. van 
WisHr is omitted : 
(Communicated in the meeting of April 19, 1902). 
(August 8, 1902). 
