lo E. B. Williamson 



10. male.|Bocas (?) Sta. Gather. (?)|8|. Same remarks as under Number 7, 

 except that tlie anal loop in one wing has three cells in tlie anterior row while the other 

 wing has two. 



11. male.] Bates] 143 AI143 var. A minor|ii|. The specimen is typical T. ditzlcri. 



12. female. |Batcs|38|i2|Gynacantha praedatrix Bates. Amazones (in de Selys 

 liand). The specimen is typical T. ditzlcri. 



13. male.|Panama (in de Selys' hand)|9|. The specimen is typical T. ditsleri. 



14. female. ICoary. Amaz. Sup. (in de Selys' hand)!i7|. The specimen is typical 

 T. ditzlcri. 



15. male.|Bates|5i|3o|. The specimen is typical T. ditzlcri. There are three cells 

 in the anterior row of cells in the anal loop in the right hind wing. 



16. female.|Dusem (?) 15/2 (in de Selys' hand)|24l. The specimen most closely 

 resembles T. ditzlcri, but has the anal loops unusually large with three cells in the 

 nnterior row of cells. I believe it is ditzlcri but identification is not positive. Vena- 

 tion shows it is certainly not trifida. In size and degree of constriction of the abdomen 

 it is ditzlcri. 



17. male.|Small rectangle of silver paperjSta. Cruz, Bolivial3|. Hamules conceal- 

 ed by glue or shellac ; eyes are gone and the specimen is badly faded, but the legs 

 and appendages are those of T. caribbea, to which species, in the absence of more and 

 better material, this single specimen is referred. 



18. male.|25 (?)|Para St.|4!. Head and superior appendages gone, but the legs 

 and hamules clearly show it to be T. caribbea. 



19. male.|Para. Schulz|23|trifida. petite sous race (Forster's (?) hand)|. This is 

 a specimen of T. satyrus and doubtless belonged to the same lot of specimens as that 

 from which three of the types of Gynacanlha satyrus were selected. 



20. male.|Ci.|i3|. This specimen, which lacks the last seven abdominal segments, 

 is Gyiiacantha adcla. 



21. female.|Bocas (?) Sta. Cath.|a small rectangle of orange colored paper|i4!. 

 The specimen lacks all its legs but one and the apices of the appendages are gone. I 

 think it is certainly Gynacantha adela, certainly it is not a Triacanthagyna. 



22. male.Imale.|a small rect-ingle of gilt paper|Cuba|5|trifida Ramb.|A. trifida|Type 

 Gynacantha trifida Rb.| Stock label, described in introductory sentence, with the ad- 

 ditional word type. The eyes are gone, the abdomen is slightly damaged, and the 

 left superior appendage is gone. This is one of Rambur's types of trifida. 



2^. female. Similar to Number 22, and also labelled type. The eyes are gone and 

 all of the abdomen but a few fragments of two or three basal segments. 



24. male. Similar to Number 22, also labelled type, and carrying in addition the 

 following label in de Selys' hand ; Triacanthagyna trifida R. Type de Rambur, Coll. 

 Serville, male, Cuba. The eyes are gone and only the two basal abdominal segments, 

 themselves damaged, remain. 



25. male.|Cuba|22|. The specimen is T. trifida. 



26. male.|Cuba|25|Triacanthagyna trifida. Rb. Collection Selys|. Lacks the stock 

 label described in the introductory sentence. Tlie specimen is T. trifida. 



27. male.|Cuba|2o| (?) trifida (and on the reverse) Forster dixitl. The 



specimen is T. trifida. 



28. male.|Cuba|i8|. The specimen is T. trifida. 



29. male.|S. Domingo|29|Triacanthagyna trifida Rb. Collection Selys|. Lacks 

 the stock label described in the introductory sentence. The specimen is T. trifida. 

 This and numbers 30 and 31 doubtless belonged to the same lot as one of the specimens 

 selected as one of the types of Gynacantha satyrus. 



30. male.|Santa Domingo|26|ii3|Triacantbagyna trifida R. St. Dominque male 

 (in de Selys' hand)|. The specimen is T. trifida. 



