V. DETAILED LIST OF CHARACTERS IN WHICH DIFFERENCES 

 HAVE BEEN NOTED. WITH TABLES OF MEASUREMENTS FOR 

 THE INDIVIDUAL VARIETIES OF THE SARETHA AND SUNNA- 

 BILE GROUPS. 



The following is the list of cane varieties dealt with in this paper, with 

 the locality from which they were obtained. They are arranged in groups, 

 ajid the Saretha group is divided into its red and brown sections, and in each 

 set the varieties with thinnest canes are placed first (as judged by one of the 

 crop experiments in 1917). The varieties in the Sunnabile group are placed 

 approximately opposite to those of similar thick]\ess in the Saretha series. 

 The names of places in brackets are those of the farms from whence the 

 varieties were immediately obtained. 



Saretha Group 



Katha (brown) Section 

 11. 



1 3 EalKsi (Shahjahanpur), Barabanki 

 Kntha, Giirdaspur 



CKnthd, Guru 

 ■4- Ranuii (Shahj.), Barabanki 

 \Lalri, Pani] 



1-5 



anipot 

 'Chin, Aligarh 

 Chunnee, Shahjahanpur 

 * Bumukha, Cawnpore 



Sunnabile Group 



cm. 

 1 -3 Teru, Gunlaspur 



1'4 Jiakhra (Sh&h].), Barabanki 



Ekar, Jul hinder 



1T» < 



1'6 Kanmr, Gurdaspnr 



't Chynia, Barah, N. Bihar 

 17' 



JJhaulu, Gurdaspur 

 Kayhze (Aligarh), Pilibhit 

 (Sabour), Patna 



/ Kayhze {i 

 { ketari (Sa 



Burra Chunnee (Shahj.), Bareilly 

 1 -8 Saretha (brown) (Partabgarh), AHgarh 



♦There are many Bamukha.<> and this is. I fancy, a local Cawnpore name for a Chiv-likv 

 cane grown there. 



■\ This form is quite different from the Chynia around Pusa in Bihar, a form belonging to 

 the fansahi group. 



