440 THomAs BARBOUR, 
Ameiva escul COoPE. 
CoPpE, in: Proc. Acad. nat. Sc. Philadelphia, 1862, p. 66. 
STEJNEGER, in: Proc. U. S. nation. Mus. for 1902, 1904, p. 612. 
BARBOUR, in: Mem. Mus. comp. Zool., Vol. 54, 1914, p. 310. 
I have recently (l. c.) given a resume of our knowledge of this 
species, together with its distribution. The ten examples before me are 
from St. Thomas. 
Ameiva ameiva (LinxE). 
LInNn£, Syst. Nat., ed. 10, Vol. 1, 1758, p. 202. 
BOULENGER, Cat. Liz. Brit. Mus., Vol. 2, 1885, p. 352. 
This species, so well known and widespread is usually ceited 
under the name of Ameiva surinamensis LAURENTIL. The name which 
I have used here apparently must be used in the other’s place.!) 
The only specimen before me is a young one from Trinidad whence 
the species has long been known. 
Anolis lineatopus GRAY. 
GRAY, in: Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 1840, Vol. 5, p. 113. 
BOULENGER, Cat. Liz. Brit. Mus., Vol. 2, 1885, p. 39. 
BARBOUR, in: Bull. Mus. comp. Zool., Vol. 52, 1910, p. 294. 
BARBOUR, in: Mem. Mus. comp. Zool., Vol. 54, 1914, p. 286. 
A single specimen. This is an excessively common species 
which apparently is only found in the coastal plains area about 
Kingston, Jamaica, whence comes the example before me. 
Anolis grahamii GRAY. 
Gray, Cat. Liz. Brit. Mus., 1845, p. 247. 
BARBOUR, in: Bull. Mus. comp. Zool., Vol. 52, 1910, p. 296. 
BARBOUR, in: Mem. Mus. comp. Zool., Vol. 54, 1914, p. 281. 
A single typical example with the very characteristic heavy 
swollen keels on the ventral scales strongly marked. It is from 
Kingston, Jamaica. In 1910 (l.c.) I showed how this species differs 
from its allies with which it had been confused since its original 
description. | 
1) See STEJNEGER, in: Proc. U. S. nation. Mus., Vol. 24, 1902, 
p: 183. 
