P. F. FYSON. 17 
Taste VIII. 
The third hybrid generation. 
| | 
Milos TOTALS. 
No in Parent. | Yellow.) Pale. White. | 
table IIT | Yo, oB w. 
1 10 | Yellow 25) 21 ry Lm | Zt wie 0 
2 8 | Do. oe || 255 BS 11 
3 12 Do. 25 1 2 
4 5 Do. 13 was 3 
5 fi Do. 10 6 
6 7 Do. 7 2 80 if 24 
7 13 Do. 12 a hs 
8 14 Do. 6 (2 
9 3 Do. 2 1* 
10 9 Pale 18 7 uy) 18 7 9 
11 1 White 1 6 
12 6 Do. 22 
13 72 Do. 1 8 
14 15 Do. 9 | 
1G 4 Do. | = a 6 2 tey iO 51 
16 15 Do. x 4 Wy) 10 | 
The first plant (Table III, No. 10) was evidently a pure 
yellow. Nos. 2 to 6 gave 23% whites, 767% yellows. Of Nos. 7, 
8 and 9 of this table, not enough plants were observed in flower 
to give full numbers, but they were evidently hybrid yellows. 
The white-flowered plants gave nearly all whites. No. 15 
(Table III, No. 4) was, as regards leaf and flower, a pure Jaz. 
TasLe IX. 
The fourth hybrid generation. 
| TOTALS, 
No. | Grandparent. Parent. Yellow.| Pale. | White. 
¥ 1 W 
1 | Yellow ... | Yellow ae 20 sf <= 20 0 0 
2 Do. noe Do. bee 76 6 + 
31. oo. | Do. 11 4 
4 Do. |) Bo: > 47 13 
5 Do. Do. 26 10 
6 Do. Do. 50 21 | 
a Do. Do. 5 13 1 
8 Do. Do. 37 3 12 
9 Do. Do. 72 a es 
10 | Pale Do. 33 ip wal 
11 Do. Do. 82 19 | SY, 
12 Do. | Do 30 6 10 469 41 166 
13 Do. . | Pale 10 2 1 
VE. Do: Do, 3 ie ley, (2 
14 Do. | Do. 2 | 10 
16 Do. le Wo. 14 2 8 29 5 21 
17 | Yellow | White & 0 2 
18 Do. Seti Le Oe 5 1 2 
19 Do. | Do. 3s 27 0 0 27 
* These were all that were observed in flower, of a much larger number of actual plants 
growing ; they are therefore not included in the total, It is fair to point out, that if they were 
