174 THE MENDEL JOURNAL 



Nos. 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8. Nothing is known of them, 

 except that they did not die of nephritis. Their sex, 

 and the families of some of them are shown in the 

 pedigree. 



No. 7 had no family ; Nos. 6 and 8 had families, but 

 no information was forthcoming as to them. 



No. 3. Died of nephritis. Female. 



No. 5. Married twice. Had twins twice (i.e., Nos. 

 18 — 19, 20 — 21, Generation C) by her second husband. 

 Seemingly- did not die of nephritis. 



No. 9. Eldest daughter of Generation A. Suffered 

 from vesical calculi and died of nephritis. 



Generation C. 



No. 1. The only child of No. 1, Generation B. Not 

 known to have died of nephritis. 



Nos. 2 — 17 and 23 — 26. Not known to have died 

 of nephritis or to have had vesical calculi. 



Nos. 18 — 19 and 20 — 21 were both sets of twins. 

 All four died young. 



Nos. 27—28, and 29—30 were twins. Of these Nos. 

 27, 28, and 29 died young. The other was still living in 

 1911 and was then twenty-six years of age. 



Generation D. 



No. 1. Grand-daughter of No. 1, B Generation, who 

 died of nephritis. The present subject suffered from 

 vesical calculi, incontinence of urine, and varicose veins. 

 She is about thirtj-eight years of age. 



Nos. 2 and 3 — 9. No details known. Not known to 

 have suffered from nephritis or vesical calculi. 



Nos. 10 and 11. Twin children. No. 11 died ^oung. 

 No. 10 was still living in 1911 and was then nine years 

 old. 



Generation E. 



Nos. 1 — 4. No details known. Not known to have 

 died of or suffered from nephritis or vesical calculi. 



Nos. 5, 7j 8, and 14 died in infancy from fits. No. 8, 

 in addition, had a malformed cranium. Nos. 6 and 10 

 were stillborn. 



No. 9. Had fits in infancy, and has suffered from 

 Raynaud's disease. 



