CONTENTS. 
eee nnn 
Richard Peters. 
mon salt injurious to plaister, 117. 
Explanation of some of the terms, 
used inthe “Inquiries &c.” 119, 20. 
Noranp Wirtiam Esq. his com- 
munication on the improvement by 
plaister, in LOUDON county, Virginia, 
121. Confirmation of principles and 
facts, contained in precedent pages, 
122. Some cover the plaister—in- 
stance of success on corn in tassel. 
On cut potatoes for seed. Rolling 
seed grain in plaister.—Service of 
plaister on wheat doubted. But land, 
ameliorated by clover and plaister, 
is always found best for wheat, 123. 
Fixed opinion as to plaisier. Care- 
less about land being poor or rich.— 
Prejudices against clover-hay con- 
demned, 123, 4. Names of Mr. No- 
land’s correspondents. Salivary de- 
fiuxions of horses and cattle, 125. 
See letter on ptyalism in the volume. 
Instance where plaister on virgzn sozl 
ineffectual. Compared with old land 
adjacent. Tobacco much benefitted by 
plaister, 126. Not successful on clay. 
Top dressings of plaister not only of 
no use on wheat; but retard ripe- 
ning, and crop caught by mildew, 
127. Query if mz/dew were not oc- 
casioned by some other cause. 
Thanks to correspondents. 
Fac-stm1Le of General Washington’s hand writing; and 
sketches of his private character. 
