CONCHOLOGIA INDICA. 



gratulator, Bl. t. 16, f. 2. (3. 



Grevillei, Pf. t. 127, f. 7. 



Gnerini,' Pf. t. 55, f. 1, 2. 

 — hsemastoma, Lin. t. 127, f. 2. 



hariola, Bn. t. 14, f. 6. 



Haughtoni,2 Bn. t. 28, f. 3. 



hebe.scens, Bl. t. 149, f. 1. 

 . lielieifera, Bl, t. 50, f. 3, 4. 

 7/ Helferi, Bn. t. 2j(, f. 8, 9. 



liemiopta, Bii. t. 30, f. 4 ; t. 53, f. 8. 

 f-^ls-jHodgsoni, Bl, t,^, f, 1, 2, 3. 



lionesta, Gould, t. 1)0, f, 10. 



humilis, Hut. t. 61, f. 4, 5. 6. 



Humberti, Brot, t. 159, f. 9. 



Huttoni, Pf. t. 15, f. 8. 



iiyba, Bu. t. 30, f. 2. 3. 

 — hjpliasma, Bn, t. 54, f. 3. 



hypoleuca, Bl. t. 64, f. 6, 7, 

 \ immeri^a, JjLl. 1.50, f. 7. 



-Indica, Pfft. a\ f. 1(). 



infausta, Bl. t. 159. f, 2, 3. 



infrendens,^ Goald, t. 15, f. 3, 

 (as Tickellii). 



infula, Bn. t. 54, f. 9. 



Ingrami, Bl. fc, 60, f. 9, lU. 



injussa, Bl, t. 132, f. 5, 6. 



interrupta,'' Bn. t. 27, f. 3, 



intumescens, Bl. t. Ill, f. 6. 



Isabell/ Pf. t. 27, f. 7. 



.Tnliana, Gray, t. 52, f. 7. 



Karenoriun, Bl. t. 13, f. 6. 



Koondaensis, Bl. t. 56, f. 6, 6. 



Kumaliensis,^ Th. & Stol. 



labiata, Pf. t. 27, f. 6. 

 - Inevipes.s Miill, 



Laidlayana, Bn. t, 58, f. 3, 4, 5. 



Layardi, Pf . t, 56, f. 8, 



lecythis, Bn, t, 63, f, 7, 8, 9, 



leiopbis,'' Bn. t. 13, f. 8. 

 -l-levicula, Bn, t, f-O, f, 1, 4, 

 i-ligulata,*' Fer, t, 28, f, 9. 

 I lii-atula, Pf, t, 150, f, 5, 6, 



liriciiicta, Stol. t, 132, f, 7, 



lixa, Bl, t, 149, f, 5, 6, 



lubrica, Bn, t, 51, f, 8, 9. 



maeromphalos, TL. t. 83, f. 8, 9. 



macropleuris,'' Bn, t, 87, f, 10. 

 •j-Maderaspatana, Gray, t. 28, f. 2, 



mammillaris, Bl. t. 50, f. 1, 2. 



nielanotragus. Born, t. 127, f. 3. 



Merguiensis, Phil, t, 14, f, 7, 



miccyla, Bn. t, 129, f, 8, 9, 

 : molecula, Bn. t. 91 f. 8, 9. Wji. 

 I mononema, Bn, t, 87, f. 2, 3. 

 I monticola. Hutt. t. 52, f, 3, 

 ■ mucosa,'" Bis. t. 90, f. 5, 6. 



Mnnipurensis," G, A. (Munipur). 



Nagaensis,'^ G, A, (Prowi, Nagf 



Hills). 

 ! nana,i3 Hutt. t. 61, f, 7, 8, 9, 



nebulosa, Bl t. G4. f. 8, 9, 10. 

 Neherensis, Bn t. 32, f. 6, G. 

 nepos, Pf. t. 132, f. 2, 3. 

 ■Nicobarica, Beck, t. 52, f. 1. 

 Nilagn-ica, Pf. t. 55, f. 6, 7, 

 nitida, Miiller (Cashmire). 

 novella, Pf. t, 150, f. 8. 

 nuda, Pf, t, 31, f. 7, 10, 

 oclithoplax, Bn, t. 26, f, 4. 

 odontophora, Bn, t. 57, f. 4, 5, 

 Oldhami, Bn. t. 15, f. 7. 

 orcula, Bn. t. 87, f. 1, 4. 

 ornatissima, Bn. t. GO, f. 4. 

 Orobia, Bn. t. 28, f. 8. 

 oxytes, Bn. t. 26, f. 1. 

 palmaria, Bn. t. 30, f. 5, 6. 

 pansa, Bn. t. 56, f. 1. ^ 



partita,'-" Pf. t._8|^ f. 5, 6. '^ 

 Patane, Bn. t. 130, f. 5, 6, 7. 

 pauxillula, Bn. t. 90, f. 8, 9. 

 pedina, Bn. t. 51, f. 3. 

 Peguensis, Bn. t. 58, f. 6. 

 perarcta, Bl. t. 13, f. 3. 



percompressa, ' 



Bl. 



perfucata,'^ Bn. 

 perpaula," Bn. 

 Petasus, Bn. t. 89, f. 8, 9. 

 ■petrosa.'s Hutt. t. 88, f. 7, 

 Phayrei, Th, t, 15, f, 1. 

 Pbidias, Thorp, t. 149, f. 4. 



10. 



' Compare with tbis and criuigera the Nilgherry H. tabida 

 of Pfeiffer (Moil. Hel. toI. 4, p. 27: Novit. vol. 1, pi. 12. f. 11. 

 12). It is larger and not keeled. ^ n 



ii^rti of Tryon (AMr. .WC. ™1. .i. pi. 1(1, f 



-■ The H. Cliamfl 

 2) is a synonym. 



' In Proc. Bost. 184."!, p. 139, and .Bost. ,J. Nat. H. vol. 4, p. 

 45.3, pi. 24, f. 6. Pfeiff. Mon. Hel. vol. 1, p. 152. Reeve, C. 

 Icon. Hel. f. 770. The variety Tickellii only differs in being 

 more c;irinated, and having the twin teeth clo.ser together. 



' The true H. Him.ilaviina of Lea (Obs. I'nio, vol. 1. pi. 19, 

 f. 66) is referred by lilanford to this species; but Benson's 

 erroneous ideal (Zool. J. vol. 51 was the H. cicatricosa. 



' J. Asi. Soc. Beng. 1872. vol. 41. pt. 2. p. 334. pi. 11, f 

 9, 10 : Kumah Hills, Sandoway, Aracan Hills. 



" See Pf Mon. Hel. vol. 3. p.'7o.'.-ind Kiist. Cli. Hel. pi. 84, 

 f 22, 23. 



' If this should ]irove, as is possible, the true refuga of Gould, 

 that name has priority : it resembles the refuga of Reeve, Philippi, 

 and Kuster : yet the latter (Hel. t. 66. i. 21-23) does not show 

 the lamella correctly, nor the spiral sculpture, and almost 

 equally with the second makes the outline of the last whorl 

 opposite the month as prominent below as above, instead of 

 slanting inwards below as in leiophis. 



" The unique example from Tranquebar of the Nanina tur- 

 binata of Beck (Ap. Mol. Christ. I'red. p. 5, and Miircli, J. Con. 



vol. 20 (1872. ji. 33), said to remind one of this shell, being in 

 the Danish Museum is inaccessible to us. 



" The H. eorys of Benson (An. Nat. 1859, ser. 2, vol. 3, p. 

 265) is the young of this shell. r3i»^'/iJv 



'» The H. seposita of Benson CAn. Nar^IiscTl 869, April) is 

 only known to us by a sketch of Benson's, which precisely 

 resembles shells given us by Blanford as his mucosa.-$-/^Oi*.- 



" Z. P. 1874, p. 610, pi. 73. f 6, as H. (Plect.). 



" Z. P. 1874, p. 609, pi. 73, f. 4, as H. (Plect.). 



" Benson statesthat the buUula of Reeve represents this shell . 



" In the Zoology of Belanger's Voyage we find (Moll. p. 414, 

 pi. 1, f. 8. 9. 10) a H. semifusca. from near Pondicherry. Its 

 figure reminds us of this shell, liut it is said to have eight or nine 

 whorls (four more than are represented). That of Pfeiffer is 

 really Indian, and quite distinct. The H. raarcida of Benson 

 (An. Nat, 1853, p. 92) is generally considered a form of partita, 

 or some near ally (subopaca, &c.). The date is subsequent to 

 that of the species so named by Shuttleworth (1852). 



'^ Pr. Zool. 1869, p. 446. Near sanis: from Bhamo. 



'« An.Nat.H. 1853, p.93.—Pf Mon. Hel. vol.4,p.50 fromCeylon. 



" An. Nat. H. 1859, p. 390.— Pf Mon. Hel. vol. 6, p. 69 : 

 from Phie Than, Tenasserim. 



" Benson erroneously identified this shell with the imper- 

 forated five-whorled H. vitrinoides of Deshayes (Mag. de Z. 1831, 

 pi. 26), of which the locality was then unknown. In Kuster's 





