CONCHOLOGIA INDICA. 



Nayicella. 

 caBrulescens, Reeve, t. 137, f. 2, 3. 

 compressa, Pear. t. 137, f. 1, 4. 

 Livesayi, Dolirn, t. 137, f. 8, 9. 

 reticulata, Reeve, t. 137, f. 5, 6. 

 squamata, Dohrn, t. 157, f. 1, 4. 



Anctlcs.' 

 Ceylanica, Bn. t. 81, f. 1, 4. 

 verruca, Bn. t. 81, f. 2, 3. 



Camptonts. 

 Theobald!, Bn. t. 81, f. 5, 6. 

 liTtuj jU^Z^J SuCCDfEA.' 

 acnminata, Bl. t. 68, f. 7. 

 Baconi, Pf. t. 68, f. 1, 4. 

 Bensoni, Pf. t. <ol , f. 9. 

 Ceylanica, Pf. t. 158, f. 10. 

 collina, Bl. t. 68, f. 8, 9, 10. 

 crassiuscnla, Bn. t. 68, f . 5, 6. 

 dancina, Pf. t. &7, f. 7. 

 «^Girnarica, Th. t. 67, f. 5, 6. 

 Indica, Pf. t. &1, f. 1, 4. 

 Pfeiiferi, Rossm. ( Caslimire) . 

 plicata, Bl. t. 67, f. 8. 

 pntris, Lin. (Gashmire). 

 rutilans, Bl. t. 67, f. 10. 

 snbgranosa, Pf. t. 158, f. 8, 9. 

 semiserica, Gould, t. &1 , f. 2, 3. 

 vifcrea, Pf. t. 68, f. 2, 3. 



LlTHOTIS. 



rupicola, Bl. t. 81, f. 7. 

 tumida, Bl. t. 81, f. 8, 9. 



Phtsa. 

 (?) Coromandelica,' Dunker. 



Camptoceeas. 



Austeni, Bl. t. 158, f. 3, 4. 

 lineata, Bl. t. 158, f. 5, 6. 

 terebra, Bl. t. 158, f. 1, 2. 



LniNj;A.* 



acuminata. Lam. t. 69, f. 8, 9. 

 amygdalns, Trosch. t. 69, f. 7, 10. 

 auricularia,^ Linnajus. 

 brevicauda, Sow. t. I'lB, f. 7. 

 chlamys,^ Bn. t. 69, f. 5, 6. 

 Inteola, Lam. t. 70, f. 5, 6. 

 marginata,^ Michaud, in Drap.Sup. 

 ovalis, Gray, t. 70, f. 2, 3, 4. 

 peregra,^ Linna3us. 

 pinguis, Dolirn, t. 70, f. 7, 8, 10. 

 rufescens. Gray, t. 69, f . 1, 4 ; t. 70, 



f. 1, 9. 

 stagnalis,^ Lin. 

 tigrina,' Dohrn. 

 truncatula,' Miiller. 



Melania.^ 



acanthica, Dohrn (as of Lea), t. 

 i 110, f. 10. 



baccata, Gould, t. 75, f. 1 to 4. 

 Batana, Gould, t. 74, f. 8, 9. 

 Broti, Dohrn, t. 71, f. 2, 3. 

 confasa, Dohrn, t. 72, f. 4. 

 datura, Dohrn, t. 73, f. 10. 



episcopalis. Lea, t. 72, f. 7 ; t. 75, 



f. 5, 7. 

 fuscata, Born, t. 109, f. 4. 

 gloriosa, Anth. t. 72, f. 1, 2. 

 Hanleyi, G. A. t. 110, f. 5. 

 Herculea, Gould, t. 72, f . 5 ; t. 109, 



f. 7. 

 Hugeli, Phil. t. 71. f. 5, 6. 

 humerosa,'" Gould (Tavoy). 

 Iravadica, Bl. t. 71, f. 1. 

 jugicostis, Bn. t. 110, f. 8, 9. 

 Layardi, Dohrn, t. 73, f. 9. 

 lineata. Gray, t. 71, f. 7. 

 Menkiana, Lea, t. 110, f. 6. 

 pagodula, Gould, t. 153, f. 3. 

 Peguensis," Ant. t. 72, f. 6. 

 prasmorsa, Tryon, t. 153, f. 2. 

 pyramis, Bn. t. 110, f. 3, 4. 

 Reevei, Brot. t. 72, f . 3 ; t.l53, f . 1, 5. 

 Riqueti, Grat. t. 71, f. 10. 

 rudis. Lea, t. 74, f. 7, 10. 

 scabra, Miill. t. 73, f . 1 to 4 ; var. 



elegans, t. 73, f . 5, 6, 7 ; var. ? 



spinulosa, t. 110, f. 7. 

 spinata, G. A. t. 109, f. 1. 

 terebra, Bn. t. 71, f. 8, 9. 

 tigrina, Hutt. t. 110, f. 1, 2. 

 Tirouri F Per. t. 74, f. 5, 6. 

 tnberculata, Miill. t. 74, f. 1 to 4; 



t. 73, f. 8, as Layardi. 

 variabilis, '2 Bn. t. 109, f. 2, 3, 5, 6 ; 



var. spinosa, t. 75, f. 5, 6. 

 zonata, Bn. t. 71, f. 4. 



' The A. Baconi of Bourgignat, if distinct, has not been 

 fouud by our Indian collectors. 



- Compare with our species the S. rugosa of Pfeiffer (Mon. 

 Helic. vol. 2, p. 617), said to have only two and a half whorls, 

 an extremely short spire, and to come from near Pondieherry. 



' Mai. Bliit. 1862. Two immature specimens of a short- 

 spired Physa were obtained at Quilon by Benson, but have not 

 the carinated spire of this (.-Vustralian ?) species. 



* Kuster's monograph has been vainly studied. Besides 

 sundry from that latitudinarian locality " E. Indies," there is a 

 L. oliva (? = luteola) from Bengal, and a L. striata (as of Benson!) 

 from Barrakpore, Mr. W. Blanford has sent us a specimen from 

 near Le, Thibet, of what proves to be the L. scabris of the 

 Conch. Iconica, which is perhaps the biformis of Kuster, and 

 possibly the lagotis of Kobelt (Mai. Blat. 1872). It is possibly 

 a distorted peregra. In Wiegmaun's Archives for 1837 is a 

 paper by Troschel on the Gangetic species, but the descriptions 

 are much too brief. His prunum seems our pinguis, var. (f. 8), 

 and not unlikely is the succinea of Deshayes (Voy. Belang. Zool. 

 pi. 2, f. 13," 14) from Malabar, which is not the shell so termed 

 in Reeve's ' Iconica' ; his patula we refer to rufesceni ; hie 



impura is unknown to us ; his cerasum, sulcatula, and nucleus, 

 are evidently either ovalis or luteola. 



' From Affghanistan and Gashmire : too well known to 

 figure. L. Baetriana of Hutton (inadequately described in J. 

 Asi. Beng. 1849, p. GSe) was, perhaps, peregra. 



' L. hians of Sowerby's monograph (C. Icon. Lim. f. 57, a) 

 is the young. 



' From the Shan Provinces. 



* The type is just like a streaked form of Benson's L. bulla ; 

 we doubt it as a species. 



" See also M. fluctuosa of Gould (Pr. Bost. N. H. vol. 2, p. 

 219 ; Otia, p. 200) from Tavoy, which is too curtly described to 

 be identified. The Travancore Clea ! Anneslyi (Pseudoliva 

 Nassoides Hani.) of Benson (An. Nat. H. 1860, p. 258), lives 

 in saltish water. 



'» Proc. Bost. N. H. vol. 2 (1847); Otia, p. 200. "Allied 

 to M. Virginica, Say." 



" The reference to the American Journal must be expunged ; 

 it is only a manuscript species. 



" Too much latitude has been given to this species. We have 

 figured the variabilis, var. vittata of Theobald (J. Asi. Beng. 



