64. THE COMPLETE WILDFOWLER 
If we cross varieties of one species, modification is certainly 
lost, for a time at least, and we invariably find reversion of 
some kind. This may not always be apparent outwardly, but 
usually it is particularly noticeable in the temper and behaviour 
of certain crosses of dogs. Cross-breds are, as a rule, not 
nearly so affectionate or mild in temper as dogs from a long 
line of good breeding. This might be taken as a fair instance, 
but it requires close observation of the tendency in the domestic 
canine family when crossed to revert to their original progeni- 
tors, which, we have been given to understand, were somewhat 
similar animals to the wolves and the jackals. I am very much 
inclined to believe that man and dog in prehistoric times made 
a naturally combined mutual agreement in the hunting field. 
We do know dogs are our oldest domestic animals. My 
remarks on cross-bred dogs, as well as pure breeds, are from 
long experience in shooting over them. Cross-breds are not 
nearly so devoted to their masters, they vary every day in their 
work, and are by no means so reliable as well-bred dogs. 
THE IDEAL DOG 
In a wildfowl dog we require a strong, brave animal. Too 
‘‘fine breeding ’”’ with regard to selective appearance should be 
avoided. By this I mean—breed from only the strongest and 
best of your lot. Fine breeding, however, need not be feared 
if animals are chosen which have proved themselves good at 
their work. I have always had an inclination towards well- 
bred animals. I am sorry to state that my preference is not 
shared by all wildfowlers or gunners generally, though I believe 
the sooner it is the better will be the sporting results. I con- 
tent myself by thinking that enough scope remains, no matter 
how small it may at first appear, for we cannot remain stationary 
with any living form, to improve our present breeds without 
seeking to make others. 
- 
- Se, 
