PLAN OF THE ARGUMENT. 369 



and perhaps write, upon a subject so dear to us as 

 zoological science, we wish to express our sentiments 

 with all the moderation that can be consistent with 

 a strenuous defence of opinions. We are sensible 

 that all these may not be correct, but it is hard to 

 believe that some are not fully borne out by the 

 evidence produced. For those who may con- 

 scientiously differ from us, we hope to preserve the 

 same good-will as heretofore, and we only ask the 

 same from them. One thing may be safely said, 

 that, in discussing the state of science, and becoming 

 a humble suitor in its behalf to those exalted few 

 who have the power of honouring its professors, 

 no feeling of a personal nature is to be answered. 

 We can plead the cause of others, and rejoice in 

 their honours, although physical incapacity and 

 confirmed habits of seclusion will ever prevent 

 individual participation. If but one firm and efficient 

 step is taken, by those in power, towards reinstating 

 the science of Britain in that pre-eminence she once 

 held, we shall be amply repaid for the irksomeness 

 of conveying censure, and of criticising public in- 

 stitutions. 



(253.) In discussing the question now before us, 

 we shall endeavour to point out the most effectual 

 means by which zoological science may be promoted 

 and upheld ; first, by the universities, and secondly, 

 by the government. 



(254.) If tastes are to be formed, and feelings 

 implanted in the human mind, they will never so 

 firmly take root as in the spring of life. Hence, if 

 we may indulge a hope, that science may eventually 

 hold that station among us which it elsewhere 



B B 



