1S;3.] 



On Parliamentury Allcndance and Voles. 



133 



Twtrdy-one Votes. 

 Kciirt, John 

 Giitfitli, Joliij \V. 

 Westcin, Charles C. 



Ticnity, 

 Abercromby, Hou. James 

 Coiicannon, Lucius 

 Majoribanks, Stewart 

 O'Callaghan, James 

 Wyvill, Marmaduke. 



h'heteeii. 

 Carter, John 

 JHaldimand, William (t) 

 ^Hill, Lord Arthur 

 jcrvoise, George P, (;)) 

 IMackin'iosli, Sir Jas. bart. 

 Sykes, Daniel. 



Eighteen. 

 Bync;, George 

 Dundas, Hon. Thomas 

 Folkestone, Visconnt 

 Graham, Sandford 

 JKeniiedy, Thomas F. 

 Phillips, George R. 

 Kussel, Lord John 

 Scott, James. 



Sevinlecn. 



Scveiitren P'ntrs. » 

 niakc. Sir Francis, bart. 

 ^Cottin, Sir Isaac, bart. 

 Heron, Sir Robert, bart. 

 Hurst, Robert 

 5SJohnstoue, William A. 

 Phillips, George 

 Powlett, Hon. Wm. J. F. 

 Rickfurd, William (p) 

 Stanley, Lord 

 Webbe, Edward (p). 



Sixtfen, 

 Allan, John H. 

 Boughey, Sir John, bart. 

 Hury, Viscount 

 Fitzsterald, Lord Wm. C. 

 §Hughes, William L. 

 Ord, William 

 Smith, Hon. Robert 

 Tennyson, Charles 

 Warre, James A. 

 Williams, John. 



Fifleen. 

 (jBarnard, Viscount 

 Calvert, Nicholas 

 Colburnc, Sir N.AV.K. bart 

 iJFitzroy, Lord Charles 

 Gaskell, Benjamin 



Beaumont, T. W. 



I had in like manner drawn out tlie 

 names of all the members who are 

 recorded in your Supplement, as hav- 

 ing given votes on the popular side of 

 any of the fifty questions above refer- 

 red to, from twelve votes eaeh down 

 to a single vote ; but, besides the bur- 

 thening of your pages with too many 

 names, the printing of them here would, 

 in a degree, lake from tlie honourable 

 distinetion whieli I wish to see bestow- 

 ed on the 132 names* already men- 

 tioned : I shall therefore briefly, and in 

 a tabular form, slate the principal 

 remaining results, as follows:— 



* These 132 names (with the exception 

 of F. Lawley,) will be found alpliabeli- 

 cally arranged in p. 657 of your Supple- 

 ment ; mixed with .Vi other names, part of 

 the 101 persons who had given from twelve 

 to four popular votes each on the fifty 

 <jucstions. 



Fifleen Votes. 

 Maxwell, John (t) 

 Pare^, Thomas 

 Power, Richard 

 Pym, Francis 

 Ridley, Sir Matt. W. bart. 

 Tavistock, Marquis 

 Taylor, Michael R. 

 Titohfield, Marquis (t) 

 Whitbread, William H. 



Fourteen, 

 {Bentinck, Lord Wm. H. C. 

 Brown, Dominic 

 Clifton, Viscount 

 Ciirwen, John C. 

 Milbank, Mark 

 Newman, Robert W. (p) 

 §Palmer, Charles 

 Ramsden, John C. 

 Rowley, Sir William 

 Smith, Samuel. (;>, t,) 



Thirteen. 

 Barham, John F. 

 Cavendish, Charles C. 

 ^Cavendish, LordH. F. C. 

 Lemon, Sir Wm. bail, (p) 

 Lloyd, Sir Edward P. bart. 

 Smith, John. 



\l\.— Particulars as to the Votes, less than 

 thirteen in number, indimiluully, which 

 "276 Members gave, in support of Fifty 

 Popular Qaislioiis, as above. 



It hence appears, in a body of G58 

 persons, each and every one of whom 

 had laken upon himself a .sacred trust, 

 to act for the peo|)le, as llie conslitu- 

 tional check on the other two branches 

 of the legislature, tiiat, during the dis- 

 cussions and decisions on lifly imjmr- 

 fant questions, aO'ecting the people's 

 righls or property, only 408 of those 

 jiersons, or G2 per cent, of the whole 

 liody, have, as to these questions, 

 givpn even one single vote in the peo- 

 ple's favour ; and that 100 of these had 



only so given a solitary vote, chiefly 

 in favour of Catholic emancipation 

 (c in col. b, in the Sup.) 



Tliat out of these 408 per.sons, only 

 17.5, or less (ban 27 per cent, of tJic 

 whole body, had placed their conduct 

 entirely above suspicion, by rejecting 

 the pay, and never voting with* the 

 ojiponents of popular rights. 

 It 



• It must be observed, however, that 

 evidence on the head of adverse votes is 

 •uly aftoidcd us as to the fourteen out of 



tlic 



