642 
HE Commons House of Parliament is 
composed of 658 members, returned 
from the several sections of the: United 
Kingdom, inthe following proportion, viz. 
The « county of Cornwall, 44; of Wilts, 
34; of York, 30. . 108 
Sussex, 28; Dorset, 20; 
Suffolk,16; Stafford,10 74 
The counties of Devon and Hants 
each 26 52 
Kent and Somerset, 
each 18 36 
Bucks, Lancaster, and 
Surry each 14 42 
Lincoln, Norfolk, and 
Salop each 12 36 
Berks, Northampton, 
Oxford, Worcester, 
each 9 86 
Essex, Gloucester, He- 
reford, Middlesex, 
Northumberland, and 
Nottingham. each 8 48 
Cambridge, Cumber- 
Jand, Hertford and 
Warwick each 6 24 
Bedford, Chester, Der- 
by, Durham, Hun- 
tingdon, Leicester, 
and Westmorland 
each 4 28 
Monmouth, 3; Rut- 
land,2 . HES 
Wales, 24, Scotland, 453 Ireland, 100 169 
Making the Total Number of Votes 658 
TABLE I. 
Statement of the Fourteen Questions 
divided on by the fullawing Alpha- 
betical List of the Members, 
Column. 
a Notes by a *, 188 members who on 
the 6th February, 1821, supported 
the motion of the Marquis of Tavi- 
stock, “that his Majesty’s ministers, 
in advising the measures against the 
Queen, were not justifiable,” &e.; and 
by at + B34 who supported it. The same 
ehlagte also ‘notes by the letter a 21 
other members who supported the 
motion of Lord Archibald Hamilton 
on the 26th of January preceding, 
*“‘that the omission of her Majesty's 
pame from the Liturgy and accus- 
tomed prayers of the Church, was ill- 
advised and inexpedient,” who did 
not vote at all on the motion of the 
Noble Marquis. 
b Notes by the letter c, 253 members 
who, on the 28th February, 1821, sup- 
ported the motion of Mr. Plunkett, 
For the appointment of a committee 
to consider of the Laws affecting 
Roman -Cathoties,” and by the letter 
p, 247 who opposed it. 
c Notes by a*, 126 members who, on 
the 9th May, 1821, supported the 
List of the Members of the House of Commons. 
motion of Lord John Russell Foy 
Parliamentary Reform ;” aud by at, 
157 who opposed it, 
ad Notes by a*, 108 members who, on 
the 11th February, 1822, supported 
the motion of My. Brougham for “ 4 
sensible Reduction of Paves ;? and by 
a +, 212 who opposed it. ‘ 
e Notes by a*, 126 members who, on 
the 2Ist February, supported a simi- 
lar motion of Viscount Althorp; aud 
by a +, 234 who opposed it. 
Jf Notes by a*, 159 members who, on 
the 13th March, supported the motion 
of Viscount Normanby, “ For redu- 
cing one Post Master General; aud 
by at, 184 who opposed it. The same 
column also notes by the figure 2, 81 
other members who, on the 2d of 
May, supported a similar motion by 
the same noble Viscount, who did not 
vote at all on the previous occasion. 
g Notes by a*, 100 members, who, on 
the 25th of June, supported the motion 
of the Hon. James Abercromby, for 
“An enquiry into the conduct of the 
Lord Advocate of Scotland ;” and by 
a +, 121 who opposed it. 
h Notes by a *, 95 members, who, on 
the 3d of June, supported the motion 
of Mr. Curwen, for “ 4 total Repeal 
of the Duty on Salt ;? and by a +t, 
106 who opposed it. Thesame column 
also notes by the letter c, 99 other 
members in addition, who, on the 28th 
February preceding, supported the 
motion of Mr. Calcraft for ‘ A gra- 
dual Reduction in the Duties on 
Salt ;’ who did not support the motion 
of Mr. Curwen. 
i Notes by a *, 65 members, who, on 
the 18th Juue, supported Sir J. New- 
port’s amendment to Mr. Hume’s mo- 
tion, relating to the Tythe System of 
Ireland ; and by a+, 72 who Hs a es 
it. 
k Notes by a *, 175 members, who, on 
the 25th April, supported the inotion 
of Lord John Russel, for “ 4 Heform 
in Parliament ;’ which was opposed 
by 269. The same column also notes 
by the letter », 77 other members, part 
of 185, who, on the Ist of March, sup- 
ported the motion of Sir Matthew 
White Ridley, for The Reduction of 
Two Lords of the Admiralty.” 
The notations in the margin, imply as 
follow, viz. The numbers 12, &c. as 12 op- 
posite the name of J, Abercromby, implies 
that he voted 12 times in the’ minorities 
here subsequently stated. No. 27 oppo- 
-site the name of Sir George Anson, or 31 
opposite that of A. Baring, imply that they 
voted in the minority on those questions so 
pbumbered in the said following statement. 
A, voted in support of Lord Althorp’s pro- 
position in ‘“ Committee on the Corn 
Laws ;” E, for those of Sir Thomas Leth- 
bridge ; 
t 
