List of Members of the House of Commons. 
bridge; R, for those of Mr. Ricardo. M, 
implies those who opposed the propositions 
of the late Marquis of Londonderry, and 
contended. for the ‘* Continuance of the 
Corn Law as it then stood.” 
W, wnplies 
those members who supported the resolu- 
tionsof Mr. Western, on the 12th of June, 
relating to the “ Aggravation of the Dis- 
tresses of the Country by the Alteration of 
the Currency.” 
TABLE Il. 
Statement of the 36 Questions, of which 
the Minorities are stated. 
Nos... 
1— 89 Who on the 5th Feb. supported 
Mr. Hume’s amendment to the 
address. . - opposed by 
2— 68 Whoon the 7th Feb. opposed 
Mr. Peel’s motion, ‘“* For leave 
to bring in a bill, suspending 
the Habeas Corpus Act in Ire- 
land,” ¥ supported by 
3— 22 Who onthe same day support- 
eda motion “ For the Irish In- 
surrection Bill to be printed to 
afford time to consider it,” 
opposed by 
4—30 Who on the 8th supported the 
> motion of Mr. Rice, to insert a 
clause in the said bill * For 
making imperative a Trial by 
Jury,” -opposed by 
5— 31 Who on the same date sup- 
ported the motion of Mr. Rice, 
to insert another clause in the 
said bill, ““ Authorising the 
Lord-Lieutenant to appoint 
County Magistrates to assist 
; in Towns,” . opposed by 
6— 28 Who on the same day opposed 
_ the passing of the Bill 
171 
195 
149 
139 
110 
supported by 109 
7—97 Who on the 13th February sup- 
ported the motion of Sir Robert 
Wilson, “ For Papers tobe laid 
before the House relating to 
his dismissal from the Army,” 
opposed by 199 
8—60, Who on the 25th February sup- 
/ ported the motion of Mr. 
James, * That it was a Breach 
ofthe Privileges of Parliament 
to open Letters to and from 
Members to and from prisoners 
inGaol,’ ... 
9— 78 Who on the 27th supported the 
motion of Mr, Hume, “ For a 
more detailed Statement of the 
manner in which £1,781,325 
estimated for the Supply of the 
Naval Service was to be ex- 
pended before the Supply was 
granted,” 
10— 56 Who on the 28th supported 
the motion of Ald. Wood 
« For a Committee to enquire 
into the cause of the Outrage 
opposed by 167 
opposed by 129 
committed on Mr. Sheriff 
Waithman, in front of the 
Knightsbridge Barracks,” 
643: 
opposed by 184 
11— 39 Who on the 4th March sup- 
ported the motion of Mr. Pas- 
coe Grenfell, “To postpone 
the clause in the 5 per Cent. 
‘Reduction Bill for remunera- 
tion to the Bank, for further 
investigation.” .. opposed by 
12—- 91 Who on the same day sup- 
ported the motion of Mr. 
Hume, “ That the Regular 
Army bereduced {rom 68,802 
to 57,802, or 10,000 men,” 
76 
opposed by 195 
i3— 88 Who on the 14th March sup- 
ported the motion of Mr, 
Creevy, “ Foran enquiry into 
Duties of the Board of Con- 
trol” ; ‘ 
14— 33 Who on the 15th supported 
the motion of Mr Hume, “'fo 
reduce the expences of the 
Military Staff of Great Britain 
and the Colonies, from 
£96,846 to £84,000,” 
opposed by 273 
opposed by 109 
15— 18 Who on the 20th supported 
the motion of Mr. Hume} ‘* To 
reduce the Salary of the Judge 
Advocate-General from 
to £1,500 per Ann, opposed by 124 
16— 17 Who on the 28th supported 
the question of a Petition 
from the Inhabitants of Beth- 
nal Green, on behalf of Mr. 
Hunt, andimputing notorious 
and avowed Corruption in 
Parliament — should lie on 
the table opposed by 
17— 26 Who on the 20th supported 
the motion of Mr. Hume, 
“For a reduction of £5,000 
per Annum in the expences 
of the Staff of the Royal Mi- 
litary College,” opposed by 
18— 21 Who on the 22nd supported 
the motion of Mr. Hume “To 
reduce the eharge for Sine- 
cure Offices in the Garrisons 
abroad and at home £12,000 
per Annum,” opposed by 
19—80 Who on the 25th supported 
the motion of Mr. Hume “ To 
reduce the Vote for the Ex- 
pence of the Ordnance Esta- 
blishments at the Tower and 
in Pall Mall £10,000 per An- 
num . . . opposed by 
20—- 22 Who on the same date sup- 
ported the motion of Mr. . 
Creevy, relating to a mis- 
application of the 44 percent. 
Duties in Barbadoes 
opposed by 
62 
21— 39 
