502 Proceedings of the OJiio State .leadeiny of Science. 



dish-tan to paler. S. 165; St. 82; 

 H. 90; A'l. 69; Ad:c. 100. 



C. infundibulif arm Schaeff. 

 G.- Pileus glabrous, not umbonate, yel- 

 lowish-brown. S. 172; St. 86; H. 

 loi ; Mc. 103. 



C. Haccida Sowerb. 



Notes. 



C. ohiensis Mont. Syll. Crypt. 100. S. 181, is iM-obably C. 

 nebularis Batsch. although the description does not quite agree in 

 some respects. 



C. reticeps Mont. Syll. Cr^'pt. loi, S. 150. is probably (J. 

 laccata Scop. 



Saccardo publishes C. sul)ditopoda Peck as "umbonate." 

 Peck descriljed it as umljilicate and says he separated it from C. 

 ditopoda Fr. on account of the paler lamellae, striate margin and 

 longer spores. C. diLO]iocla, however, is not umbilicate. 



C. pruinosa Lasch was first reported by Lea, but does not 

 seem to have been found since. None of Montague's species 

 have l^een identified since their pnl)lication. 



According to IJresarlola C. monadelpha is the same as C. 

 tabescens (Scop.) Cres. of Europe (Lloyd Myc. Xotes 1:54). 



Lentinus caespitosus Lerk. and Pleurotus caespitosus B. & 

 C. are names of the same ijlant. The description fits the plant 

 now known as C. monadelpha Morg. 



COLLY BL\ FR. 



A.^ Pileus usually more than i cm. broad. 



B.' Stipe glabrous or nearly so. exce])t at base. 



C.^ Lamellae usually more than 4 mm. broad, distant, al- 

 ways white. 

 D.^ Pileus glabrous, viscid when moist; stipe usually 

 long-rooting. S. 200; H. 107-8; St. 97; A. 

 . 92; Mc. 113; P. R. 49:35, M. 70. 



C. radicato Relh. 



