BY MISS A. E. PROUT. 478 



than in invenusta, and in the curve of the postmedial hne, 

 which, in s.errata is more strongly bent outward from costa, 

 distally concave at R^, inwardly obli(ine (though minutely 

 dentate on yeins) from R^ to middle of fold, distally dentate 

 oi;i SM^^and hind margin; orbicular and reniform white, the 

 former a sharply-marked round dot ; medial area of wing less 

 clearlv buff-pink (Ridgway, pi. xxxviii), with broader dark 

 clouding than in invenusta. Hind ivinq nearly as in invenusta , 

 but termen slightly fuller (more rounded), at least in the cf . 

 Ufiderside less tinged with buff than in invenusta, the 

 postinedial line on both wings somewhat more excnrved. 



yit. Murud, November, without elevation — 1 9 • The cT 

 holotype is also from this collection, almost certainly from 

 ]\tt. Muriid, biit, is unfortunately one of the specimens over 

 which some confusion lias arisen in labelling. 



In vie^^■ of the important difference in neuration it may 

 be necessa^rv later on to create a new genns for serrata ; 

 but serrata and invenusta are so obviously nearly related and 

 th^ transition, from no areole to areole (by means of short 

 par) is in tins instance so easily explained that T have 

 preferred to describe serrata as a Ftaphiseopa. 



80. , LijDHiLARiA species. 



Mt, Murud, 6000-6500 feet, October— 1 9. 

 , This specimen, which has lost one hind wing and is other- 

 ^vise, not in first rate condition, appears to be nearly related 

 ijQ Mastigovhorus punctilinea Wileman (placed by Sir G. 

 Hampson in lAthilorici^. the tvpe of which I have been 

 permitted to see, by the kindness of Mr. Wileman. Tt 

 niinht possibly even be the of punetilinea, bnt will fnr 

 niore probably be fonnd to be at least racially district. Tt 

 b.a.s not seemed advisable to publish any description from 

 one rather poor 9 • 



81. Bleptina delosticha Swinh. 



Bl/iptina delosticha Swinh., A.M.N.H. (7) xvii, p. r).52, Sumatra. 



This species seems to be confined to the Malayan subregion. 

 It is almost certainly neither a Bleptina (American) nor a 

 Bertula. Perhaps more nearly related to Adrapsa, bnt the 

 cell of hind wing is slightly long for that genns, with B* 

 rather far removed from the angle. As the affinities of 

 delosticha are so uncertain T have preferred to quote it under 

 the genus in which it was originally described. 



