TABLE II—CONTINUED. 
3 637 2NROUTS ie. 5, eerie: 162.4 
3 601 ANOUTSiae ae ac dacs sis 166.4 
: 3 584 Gliourets frees! is, 167.9 
3 557 SOURS «cmon soneten 170.9 
3 655 ZiHOUNS AIM adele ee 175.3 
3 618 A Wounsiy. sees alse 179.1 
a 3 610 Gru OUTS sc taeeco eas 182.9 
3 089 SUMOUES |. see cers cnet ses 184.3 
3 951 DG UTE fe oterestetonss <8 toe hg 
3 940 S HOURS }-n-bee cere 133.4 
5 3 951 ANOUTS otc esate 131.0 
3 896 [nGioUT Stas ce eee 134.4 
3 .889 Sihouns*es. aoe eeer 134.6 
mia | 
3 | 1.535 ZVROULE = Ro sie onion 165.8 
3 1.495 DO MOWESH.i5 dans ccs scvercrsicte 168.2 
6 3 1.493 AMO UTS osc oers ayapoi arses 168.8 
3 1.453 GUHOUTS 5. cies cernsye mise 170.8 
| 3 1.396 SUBIOUES feet) Ropes 171.5 
SomrE DrEsmips OF CRAWFORDSVILLE. By Mason B. THomas. 
In looking over the bibliography of Indiana cryptogams we have been 
greatly surprised at the very meager representation of our Alge. This we believe 
to be in some measure due to the lack of correlation of work already done in 
different parts of the State and upon which no report has been made. 
The past spring one of our students, Mr. F. Corey, in working on some Alge 
made a list of Desmids that we believe worth while to record. Nothing need be 
said about the list except that the determinations were carefully made and 
mounted specimens preserved of each form, together with notes on distribution, 
etc. It is the intention to prepare as complete a list as possible of Crawfordsville 
Alge with a view to some studies on distribution. Permit us to suggest that 
