A CENTURY OF ZOOLOGY IN INDIANA. 211 



Besides those who have contributed several papers each to the elucidation 

 of the fish fauna of Indiana there are several others who have Avritten one or 

 more short papers on the fishes of the state. 



I shall refer to them briefly. 



Charles Harvey Bollman, was joint author with Barton Warren Ever- 

 mann of a list of the fishes observed in the vicinity of Brookville, Indiana. 



Ernest P. Bieknell and Eletcher Basconi Dresslar reviewed the genus 

 Semotilus, 1889, a genus represented in Indiana by one of our most abundant 

 and familiar species. 



Morton William Fordice, as joint author with Carl H. Eigenmann, pub- 

 lished a list of the fishes of Bean Blossom Creek, Indiana, in 1885; also a re- 

 view of the North American species of Petromyzontidse, in 1886 (joint author 

 with Dr. Jordan) ; also a review of the sturgeons of North America, in 

 1889 (joint author with Philip H. Kirsch). Dr. Philip 11. Kirsch, for several 

 years Indiana State 1^'ish Commissioner, besides his official reports as Com- 

 missioner, wrote several fish papers. One of these was an account of the 

 fishes of Eel River and its tributaries, another was on the fishes of the Maumee 

 River basin, both published in 1894. 



Albert J. Woolman wrote a valuable paper on the fishes of Kentucky, 

 published in 1890. He also assisted the present writer in collecting and study- 

 ing the fishes of Northern Indiana in 1888. He also wrote on the fishes of 

 Florida and Mexico. 



Albert B. Ulrey studied the fishes of Wabash County, Charles Leslie 

 McKay who lost his life in Alaska in 1883, reviewed the family of sunfishes, 

 of which there are many speices in Indiana. David Kopp Goss, Charles 

 Lincoln Edwards, Bert Fesler, William L. Bray, Martin Luther Hoft'man, Jen- 

 nie E. Horning (the late Mrs. F. M. Walters), Elizabeth Hughes, Rosa Smith 

 (now Mrs. C. U. Eigenmann), and Robert Newland, while students at Indiana 

 University under Dr. Jordan, did more or less work on fishes, and each pub- 

 lished one or more papers, none of them, however, dealing directly with 

 Indiana fishes. Among the students of Dr. Eigenmann who have done some 

 work on the fish fauna of Indiana, I may mention C. H. Kennedy, Edward 

 M. Kindle, Herbert C. Reddick, D. C. Ridgley, Joseph H. Voris, and Earl 

 E. Ramsey. Most of these did work at the Indiana University Biological 

 Station at Turkey and Winona lakes. Among the students of Dr. Ever- 

 mann who have worked more or less in ichthyology may be mentioned Albert 

 J. Woolman, C'loudsley Rutter, Hiram W. Monical, D. C. Ridgely, Josei)h 

 H. Voris, William J. Moenkhaus, J. Rollin Slonaker, Ulysses O. Co.x, and 

 Fred M. Chamberlain. Each of these has made contributions of value to 

 our knowledge of fishes. Special mention should be made of Mr. Cham- 

 berlain's valuable studies of the life histories of Pacific Coast Salmon. 



From the foregoing review of the progress of ichthyology in Indiana 

 during the century just ending, it is seen that nothing whatever was known 

 of the fishes of Indiana in 1816. Not until two years after Indiana became 



