- 
8 Mr. A. G. Butler’s Contributions towards 
Mr. Miskin corrects Mr. Masters as to D. Petilia of 
Stoll, but he is mistaken; D. Chrysippus is perfectly 
distinct; we have plenty of both, and they are as constant 
as any two existing species: D. Chrysippus does not occur 
in Australia; Danais limniace does not occur in Australia, 
it is only found in India; D. hamata is a smaller and quite 
distinct species, and is, I think, identical with D. australis 
of Boisduval; Huplea Angasii is a perfectly distinct 
species, of which we have a good series in the Collection 
of the British Museum; it is more nearly allied to L. eleutho 
than to E. sylvester, Fabr.* 
There are, I believe, four distinct species of Diadema 
in Australia—D. alimena, Linn.; DV. alemene, Cramer 
(white bands on undersurface of both sexes indistinct) ; 
$ D. auge=$¢ D. nerina = var. D. proserpina, Cram. 
(white bands below distinct, tawny colouring more prevalent 
above); and D. constans, n. sp., supra.f 
Diadema Lisianassa (nee Lasinassa) is = D. Manilia, 
Cramer, and only occurs, so far as | know, in Amboina: 
D. Bolina ranges all over India, from the Himalayas to 
Ceylon, and is of a very different type. 
Argynnis niphe does not occur in Australia; the insect 
intended is A. inconstans, Butler (Cist. Ent. vii. p. 164): 
A, niphe is a well-known mimic of Danais Chrysippus, 
but, so far as I have been able to ascertain, A. inconstans 
has not followed its example with respect to D. petilia. 
Cynthia arsinoé of Masters is the C. ada of M. R. Butler, 
P. Z. 8. 1873; C. arsinoé appears to be confined to Am- 
boina and Ceram, but at any rate the Queensland species 
is utterly different. 
Doleschallia Australis, Felder, is quite distinct from 
D. bisaltide. My. Miskin is also wrong in considering 
the genus to be identical with Aadlima. 
Mycalesis Remulia of Cramer does not occur in Aus- 
tralia, the Satyrus Remulia of Godart beimg quite dis- 
tinct, and = M., terminus, Fabricius. 
In my Catalogue of Satyride I restricted Xenica, 
Westwood, to the two species X. abeona and X. Joanna ; 
and as I have figured the structural distinctions between 
my two genera Gettoneura and Argynnina, it would be 
* With regard to this species see my Fabrician Catalogue, p. 3 (1869). 
+ We have a good series of D. alemene and D. auge in both sexes, but 
no intermediate. 
