- 
10 Mr. A. G. Butler’s Contributions, §c. 
repanda of Felder. N. beata and N. denitza* of Hewit- 
son are not referable to the latter genus, but to Chetoc- 
neme. A. argenteo-ornatus of Hewitson is certainly not 
an Astictopterus. Hesperilla halyzia and H. Leachii are 
sexes. 
As regards the Lycenide, I have paid but little atten- 
tion to them, but I should refer “Lucia” lucanus to 
Zeritis ; L. aurifer is identical with Lycena discifer, and 
would better be placed in Chrysophanus ; Holochila absi- 
milis, Felder, should be retained as a distinct genus; 
LL. agricola is a Lycena, L. alsulus probably a Lampides, 
LL. amazaraa Lycenesthes, L. ancyra and berenice species 
of Lampides, L. biocellata probably Lycenesthes, L. byzos 
probably Scolitantides, L. enejus and damoétes, Lampides ; 
L. danis a Danis, L. dion a Lampides, L. erinus a 
Lycena, L. ignita a Miletus, L. labradus and lysimon, 
Lycene; L. perusia, platissa, serpentata and strabo 
species of Lampides, L. salamandri= L. taygetus a Danis, 
L. xanthospilos a Pithecops. 
The name Miletus has priority over Hypochrysops, and 
should be retained: JZ. epicletus is not Australian. There 
are two nearly allied species of Amblypodia in Australia, 
one of them nearly allied to dA. amytis, the other to 
A. centaurus ; probably Mr. Miskin got hold of one and 
Mr. Masters of the other; the two insects seem both to 
be distinct from the above-named species. 
Since the publication of Mr. Masters’ Catalogue, several 
new Australian forms have been described both by 
Mr. Hewitson and myself, but I shall reserve them, as 
well as the question of admitting all the other species 
claimed for the Australian fauna by Mr. Miskin, for my 
intended work on the Butterflies of Australia. 
* Hewitson’s figures of these species are, I believe, wrongly numbered. 
