358 Mr. H. J. Elwes’ catalogue of the 
the last, but it still oceurs in Sikkim. I procured one 
or two males from natives in 1886. I have not seen 
the female. 
177. Huthalia durga. 
Adolias durga, Moore, Cat. Lep. H.1.C., p.196 (1857), £ 
Euthaha durga, Butt. Ind., ii., p. 199. 
Not so rare as the last two species, but seldom found 
in late years. Moller’s few specimens were taken in 
June, July, and August at about 3 to 5000 ft. 
178. Huthalia duda. 
Euthalia duda, Staud., Ex. Schmett., pt. 1., p. 152, 
t. lili., (1886), ¢; de Nicé., P.Z.8., 1887, p.455, 2. 
Two males of this species have been in my collection 
for some years, and I had described it for this paper 
when I found that it had already been made known by 
Dr. Staudinger and Mr. de Nicéville. It is quite distinct 
from, though nearly allied to, H. durga, the differences 
being noted below. It must be very rare in Sikkim, as 
none have been obtained of late years by Moller or 
myself. 
The band of the fore wing is differently shaped, 
having the first white spot on the costa almost obsolete, 
and not elongated inwards in a distinct white line, as in 
durga. The fourth patch is out of line with the others, 
the fifth, sixth, and those below it are much shorter, and 
not bordered outwardly with a bluish band, as in durga. 
On the hind wing the band is not outwardly bordered 
with a black line, as in durga, is shorter and directed 
more inwards, and, instead of a distinct bluish band 
extending beyond the white one to the anal angle, there 
is a fainter, more lilac, and less-defined band. On the 
under side the difference is less marked, but the shape 
and direction of the white bands are quite distinct, and 
the ground colour greenish rather than blue-grey, as in 
durga. The black external band on the fore wings of 
susanus is broader, more defined, and touches the lower 
part of the white band, which is not the case in durga. 
The size of my two specimens are nearly half-an-inch 
less in expanse than durga. 
