816 Colonel Charles Swinhoe on 
obliged to protest against the aggressive tone adopted 
by de Nicéville in this, as on almost all occasions when 
criticising the work of his contemporaries, I am bound 
to admit the general correctness of his conclusions. It . 
is a pity he does not say upon the examination of how 
many specimens of both sexes of both species he grounds 
his conclusions ; in my own collection are several un- 
doubted males of Capila jayadeva, Moore, a specimen 
corresponding to Moore’s description of the female, but 
which has the tuft of hairs on the hind tibie; the 
abdomen is broken, but the specimen is undoubtedly 
that of a male. But again I have a specimen corre- 
sponding to Moore’s description of Pisola zennara, which 
I believe is a male; though an old example, it is com- 
plete, and I have often thought that instead of two 
Indian species in these two genera there are three. 
Genus Crossiura, de Nicé., Journ. Bo. Nat. Hist. Soc., 
1892, p. 350. 
415. Crossiura pennicillatum, de Nicé., l.c., p. 851, pl. g, 
fale Siekeee:< 
Shillong. Two males. 
Genus Satarupa, Moore. 
416. Satarupa sambara (Moore), Cat. Lep. E. I. C., i., 
p. 246 (1857). 
Very common. 
Genus Darmto, Murray. 
417. Daimio bhagava (Moore), P.Z.8., 1865, p. 781. 
Many examples. 
418. Daimio phisara (Moore), Journ. As. Soc. Beng., 
1884, p. 50. 
Shillong. Two examples. 
The above two are very doubtfully distinct species. 
419. Daimio narada (Moore), l. c., p. 51. 
Many examples. 
Genus Sarancesa, Moore. 
420. Sarangesa dasahara (Moore), P. Z.8., 1865, p. 787. 
Shillong. Four examples. 
A widely spread species; I have it from Sikkim, Ran- 
goon, and South Kanara. 
