578 Mr. W. F. H. Blandford’s supplementary notes 
is in form a short, almost orbicular, oval, whereas in 
T’. pubtpenne it is by comparison slightly but perceptibly 
acuminate. 
In my description of the latter insect the club is 
incorrectly described as non-acuminate. It appears so 
when compared with that of 7. quercus, but not with that 
of the present species. The rows of punctures on the 
elytra of 7’. pubipenne, indistinct though they are, are 
much more evident than in 7’. sordidwm, and the sutural 
row is perceptibly, though weakly, impressed; on the 
other hand, the apex of the elytra in the former species 
shows no trace of striz. 
T. sordidum is even more like the description of 
T. politum, Say, than is 7’. pubipenne, but as it appears 
to be a larger insect, and, as far as I can discover, is 
without any suture on the antennal club, I hesitate to 
identify it with that American species. 
Crossotarsus concinnus, n. n. 
C. chapuisi, Blandf., Trans. Ent. Soc. 1894, p. 129. 
I unfortunately overlooked the fact that Duvivier had 
described an African Crossotarsus under the name 
chapuisi, and therefore substitute the above name for 
the one I previously employed. 
SCOLYTIDAi NIPONIC Ai. 
SpHAEROTRYPES, Blandf. 
pila, Blandf. 
Hyuesinus, Fabr. 
SCOLYTINI. 
Hytastes, Er. 
parallelus, Chap. 
attenuatus, Hr. 
plumbeus, Blandf. 
obscurus, Chap. 
ambiguus, Blandf. 
interstitialis, Chap. 
costatus, Blandf. 
nobilis, Blandf. 
laticollis, Blandf. 
tristis, Blandf. 
cingulatus, Blandf. 
scutulatus, Blandf. 
glabratus, Zett. 
Puxoeosinus, Chap. 
decumanus, Hr. i P 
pulchellus, Blandf. 
dubius, Blandf. 
minutus, Blandf. 
perlatus, Chap. 
seriatus, Blandf. 
lewisi, Chap. 
rudis, Blandf. 
Myenopuinus, Hichh. 
piniperda, Fabr. 
minor, Hart. 
Hyorryyncuus, Blandf. 
lewisi, Blandf. 
