(; cox. ) 
ERRATA. 
TRANSACTIONS. 
Page 220, line 21 from top, for parallelipipedus read parallelopipedus. 
Page 252, line 7 from top, for parallelipipedus read parallelopipedus. 
Page 270, line 20 from bottom, for Hemisodorius read Hemésodorcus. 
Page 546, line 1, for ewbaea read euboea. 
Page 556, line 7 from bottom, for eubaea read euboea. 
Page 556, line 6 from bottom, for eubaea read euboea. 
Page 556, line 6 from bottom, for Heterchroa read Heterochroa 
PROCEEDINGS. 
Page cxxx, line 23 from top, for aedipus read oedipus. 
CORRIGENDA. 
THE BUTTERFLIES OF THE WHITE NItz, by G. B. LonestarFr. 
Page 29, line 15 from bottom, delete ‘* Yerbury records H. iterata, Butler, 
for Aden.” The paragraph should read— 
“The form, H. iterata, Butler, is recorded for Somaliland (Lieut. Sparrow), 
as well as for German East Africa, and British East Africa. Aurivillius 3. 
p. 389) doubts whether it is specifically distinct.” 
Page 51, line 17 from bottom, delete ‘“‘ with the notable exception of the 
total absence of the great genus Acraea.” ; 
Though it is true that no Acraea has been recorded from the Aden district, 
A. doubledayi arabica, Eltringham, has been taken in the Azraki Ravine in 
Southern Arabia [Eltringham, 14, p. 174], also A. neobule arabica, Rebel, 
has been taken near Makalla, as well as at Ras Furtak, both in 8. Arabia, c. 
Lat. 14° N. and 16° N. respectively, (Lepidopteren aus Siidarabien u. v, d. 
Insel Sokotra, Prof. Dr, H. Rebel, LX XI. B. (II. H.), p. 28. K. Akad, d. 
Wiss., Wien.). 
Consequently the table on page 50 should read— 
Acraeinae 5 2 0 
Pierinae 33 18 15 
Total 15 51 37 
Richard Clay & Sons, Limited, London and Bungay. 
