Mr. Marshall’s Catalogue of Ichneumonide. 147 
This insect is much more finely punctured than 
D. pumilus ; the antenne are longer and thinner, and 
the legs differently coloured. 
Pheogenes trepidus, Wesm. 
Wesm., Tent. 190, 16, ¢. 
Amongst some Ichneumons sent to me to name by 
Mr. E. A. Fitch I detected a female of this species ; it 
was captured by Mr. Bignell. I have also seen a speci- 
men taken by Mr. T. R. Billups at Burford Bridge, in 
November, 1880. 
Pheogenes nanus, Wesm. 
Wesm., Tent. 190, 17, °. 
I have taken two females which agree exactly with 
Wesmael’s description of this insect, except that the 
mouth and front cox are dark, and there is no trace of 
red in front of the wings. 
Taken at Norwich in July and August. 
Phaogenes impiger, Wesm. 
Wesm., Tent. 198, 80, ¢, 2; Brischke, D. Ichn. d. 
Proy. W. u. HE. Preus. 23. 
I have taken a female of this insect at Norwich, 
September 19th, 1880. 
Pheogenes suspicax, Wesm. 
Wesm., Tent. 200, 38, ¢, 2; Brischke, D. Ichn. d. 
Proy. W. u. EK. Preus. 23. 
In looking over Mr. Cameron’s Ichneumons | found a 
female, and a male which I believe to be a variety of 
this species; in my own collection I have two males 
exactly like Mr. Cameron’s. ‘These three all differ from 
Wesmael’s description in having the clypeus only pale 
yellow, and not the face also; the apex of the hind 
femora in one of my specimens is fuscous. Wesmael 
describes four varieties of the female; so it is not im- 
probable that the male may also vary. These males 
do not agree exactly with any species described by 
Wesmael or Brischke. 
