ee 
454 Mr. A. G. Butler’s List of 
Epinephele coctei, Butler, Cat. Sat., p. 68, n. 17 (1868). 
?, Reed, Monogr. Marip. Chil., expl. de las 
laminas, lam. i., fig. 3 (1877). 
Satyrus tragiscus, Reed, l. ¢., pl. iii., fig. 8 (1877). 
“Taleahuano, Chili, in beginning of February.” —T. EL. 
I think it extremely probable that this is only a 
dwarfed form of the preceding; the coloration of the 
under surface is very similar to that of the variety of 
E. tristis described above. 
11. E’pinephele pales. 
Satyrus pales, Philippi, Linn. Ent. xiv., p. 268, n. 5 
(1860). 
Var. Satyrus janiriodes, Blanchard (nee Herr.-Sch.), 
Gay’s ‘Fauna Chilena,’ vii., p. 33, n. 1, but not 
of the plates (1852). 
Epinephele blanchardi, Kirby, Syn. Cat. Diurn. Lep., 
p. 78 (1871). 
2, Satyrus coctei, &, Reed, Monogr. Marip. Chil., 
pl. 11., fig. 1 (1877). 
‘*Near La Union, Valdivia.”—T7. E. 
The typical #. pales is a darker insect than most 
examples of the species; the latter agree more nearly 
with Blanchard’s description. As Mr. Hewitson used to 
say, ‘‘ M. Blanchard has confounded three distinct species 
under one name”; his supposition, however, that one 
of these was a Hesperiid, which led Mr. Kirby to in- 
corporate it with the Hespertide, at p. 607 of his Cata- 
logue, was incorrect. 
Nrommnas, Wallengren. 
This genus principally differs from Hpinephele in the 
absence of the oblique band of raised sericeous scales on 
the primaries of the males. 
12. Neomenas cenonymphina, n.s. (Pl. XXI., fig. 4). 
3. Form and coloration above of EHpinephele pales, 
but without the sericeous band on the primaries ; 
primaries below also very like H. pales, tawny with 
ereyish brown borders; the costal border narrow; an 
angular blackish ferruginous discal line, its upper 
extremity arched so as to encircle the subapical ocellus, 
