464 Mr. f.. Butler’s List of 
the apical margin; external area striated with dark 
brown; interno-basal area blackish; pectus blackish ; 
legs and venter greyish brown ; expanse of wings, 1 inch 
7 lines. 
From Reed’s collection ; locality uncertain. 
I believe this to be the species intended by Blanchard’s 
figure: the other figure (S. tristis of Blanchard), for 
which I proposed the name of Stibomorpha reedii, but 
which I did not describe (for want of a specimen corre- 
sponding with the representation), is probably the male 
of Hipparchia chiliensis. 
The present species is apparently allied to the ‘‘ Satyrus 
nycteropus”’ of Reed (pl. iii, fig. 2), subsequently in- 
correctly identified by that author with S. boisduvali ; 
S. nycteropus is, however, represented with a large bi- 
pupillated ocellus on the under surface, and with the 
wings more produced than in Neosatyrus reedii : in these 
respects it more nearly agrees with Neomenas cano- 
nymphina, from which it however differs in the darker 
coloration of the dise of the primaries, and the smoky 
brown, instead of testaceous, coloration of the dise of 
the secondaries ; the undulation of the post-median line 
on these wings is also quite unlike N. canonymphina, and 
similar to that of N. reedii. 
29. Neosatyrus humilis. 
Stygnus humilis, Felder, Reise der Noy. Lep., iii., p. 489, 
n. 844 (1867). 
‘*Common in woods in Valdivia.” —T’. EL. 
This is the Neosatyrus ambioria of Reed’s description 
and figures, but not of Wallengren ; Mr. Edmonds had 
evidently identified it correctly, for he notes it as a 
“small butterfly, blackish brown on both sides, almost 
without markings.” 
NYMPHALINA. 
Evuprormta, Doubleday. 
30. Huptoieta hortensia. 
Argynnis hortensia, Blanchard, in Gay’s ‘ Fauna 
Chilena,’ vil., p. 24, n. 5 (1852). 
A. hortensis (sic), Reed, Monogr. Marip. Chil., pl. i., 
fig. 7, (187i). 
