54 



Major F. J. Sidney Parry on 



7. Odontolahis inceqiialis, Kaup. 



8. „ Swinhoci, Bates. 



9. NcoTucamis lama, Oliv. 



10. CladoynatJms Batesi, Parry. 



11. „ dentifcr, Deyr. 



12. „ Lorqiiini, Deyr. 



13. „ Motschulshji, 



Parry. 



14. „ vittatus, Deyr. 



15. Cycloplithalmus Kanpi, Deyr. 



16. Dorcus Alcides, Voll. 



17. „ Castelnaui, DejT. 



18. ,, costatws, Lee. 



19. „ eurycephalus, Biirm. 



20. ,, punctatostriatus, lledt. 



21. ,, rubrofemoratus, Voll. 



22. Gnaphaloryx miles, Voll. 



23. JEgus amictus, Deyr. 



24. „ Formosce, Bates. 



25. „ gracilis, Deyr. 



2C. J<lijus ogimis, Deyr. 



27. ,, j)7i?7i2'piHeH.^i.«, Deyr. 



28. Sclerognathus Hpinohr, Solier. 



29. Nigidius formosaniis. Bates. 



30. ,, Parryi; Bates. 



31. Amneidus Godefroyi, Coq. 



32. Ceratognathits alboguttattcs. 



Bates. 



33. „ sexpustulatiis. 



Bates, 



SYXONTilS. 



1. Lo/mprima varians, Burm. 



2. Lucanus turcicus, Sturm. 



3. ,, Hopei, Parry. 



4. ,, sericans, Voll. 



5. Hexarthrius Chaiuloiri, Deyr. 



6. Platycerus oregonensis, Westw. 



7. Lissotes curvicornis, Boisd. 



I proceed to make a few remarks upon each of the 

 forty above-mentioned. 



Lam^prima cultridens, Burm. 



Upon again carefully reading Dr. Burmeister's de- 

 scription, and examining numerous specimens of L. 

 Micardi, the above cannot, I think, be considered as 

 distinct, and I must adhere to my already expressed 

 opinion, that it is only a variety of L. Micardi, 



Lamprima varians, Burm. 



This species has been united by Gemminger and Yon 

 Harold -svith L. Micardi, but evidently in error, although 

 it is very similar in general appearance. L. varians 

 belongs to the first section of the genus, characterized, 

 as " calcare maris antico late trigone,^' whereas L. Mi- 

 cardi belongs to the second section, " calcare maris 

 antico angusto.'^ In my former publication L. varians 

 was inadvertently placed in the second section. 



Lamprima nigricollis, Hope. 



This insect is not included among the six species of 

 the genus recorded by Mr. Hope in his Catalogue of 

 L^ccanidw (p. 1.), but the description is given at p. 28. 



